LOL, JeffS88. Damn the people on this board are f-ing hilarious!!

Trump blasting Hillary's supporters as nothing but "Hollywood celebrities who aren't very hot anymore" in latest speech.
He must be alluding to the DNC and the likes of Lena Dunham et al.
This is great! The 45th President of The United States of America basically just called Lena Dunham an ugly fading star. HA!

A woman who molested her little sister for a decade and lied about being raped endorsing a woman who ignored her husband's affairs and sexual assaults on women.
Why women would ever vote for Hillary is beyond me.

And how did she get invited to that convention to begin with, I wonder?
One reason for her bringing up that story is to try and galvanize the womens' vote for Hilary.

She admitted to molesting her sister for a decade. She also lied about being raped. In addition, she throws herself into the middle of social issues as if she's an expert.
She's a horrible person who deserves all of the bad things said about her.

and if these things you/he/whoever say are true,
There is no "if" about it. She admitted to molesting her sister and her sister confirmed it. When confronted about her rape story, she could not provide any evidence of any relationship of the guy in question, so to avoid being sued, her publisher will not include any reference to it in any future editions.
Why totally tank your position by coming at everything like a heartless douchebag?
You are acting like this is the first / only thread about her or that it is very recent news.
And the effect it had was making her look sympathetic (in my eyes at least) while making him look like an angry and possibly brain-injured child. He/you/they/whoever seem bothered that I don't hate her, too. Enough to really argue about it. It's kooky and suspect.
Not hating a child molester who lied about being raped is kooky and suspect.

Wow we can't agree on anything - b/c I think it's a massive waste of time.
Yes, I'm sure that if you keep posting comments that have no thought behind them, and no point, you will eventually convince everyone that it's a total waste of time to talk to you. I'm sure you've convinced many people already in real life and online. But, since I'm such a good person at heart, I will hold out hope for you.
getting angry at people with kitchens
You're a witless bore.
and blasting against a world that could care less
How many replies has your Ana Kasparian thread received? G'head, count them. Don't worry, I'll wait.
feel free to extrapolate my handful of sentences into another page-lo1c84ng diatribe if u like
"Feel free" is another crutch that you use, just like when you try to make a point but you realise that you can't because you're too stupid so you just say "I don't know". See? You're learning things! I'm
helping
you. But no, no, keep insisting that you're not learning a thing here - that inability to learn makes you look smart and doesn't at all prove my original point for me. Plus, you're too much
better
than me to
learn
from me.

Just knew it was gonna be so wildly exaggerated and distorted.
You believed strongly in your preconceived notion and you held onto it even after you read all the facts? What a shock!
What was so "wildly exaggerated and distorted"? Justanicknamed very simply, plainly stated
"She admitted to molesting her sister for a decade"
and
"She lied about being raped"
. There's no wild hyperbole there. There's no distortion or exaggeration.
Fully done with this NON-TOPIC.
Remember that the topic was Lena being fat and a speaker at the DNC? Remember that? Remember that you thought this was a thread unworthy of existence in the first place? Remember how you came here with an idea and left with it, and shared nothing and learned nothing?

I just finally read the case history of this so-called molestation.
Placing pebbles into her sister's vagina, paying her for kisses, getting excited having her sit in her lap, getting off on getting off next to her - these are not "so-called" molestation. They flat our ARE molestation. If the only thing she ever did was when she was 7, that would be one thing. The fact that she kept doing it for the next decade is another.
For sure, if Lena was a guy, people would be going ape-sh!t about it.
It is pretty telling that you ignore all of the other stuff she did, including lying about being raped.

and WOW again, I just finally read the case history of this so-called molestation. Just knew it was gonna be so wildly exaggerated and distorted. Good thing you folks aren't being judged by every crazy thing you did when you were SEVEN.
What a pack of hysterical nits . As soon as you read something telling you to be
outraged
, like Pavlov's dogs you obediently start panting and hitting your keyboard peddles.
Fully done with this NON-TOPIC.
Good luck in Junior High guys.

See? I knew this wasn't a waste of time!
Wow we
can't
agree on anything - b/c I think it's a massive waste of time. Looks like you've found a comfortable home here in Anti-Piggyland, oddly getting angry at people with kitchens - and blasting against a world that could care less feel free to extrapolate my handful of sentences into another page-long diatribe if u like

I wouldn't know her if she walked into my kitchen
Then why are you even here? How did you even know that 'here' exists? Why are you trying to brag about the fact that you have a kitchen? La dee da, you kitchen-having princess. I bet you cook
meals
and have
people
over, unlike us take-out eating loners, right? I bet you even have a bed to put your mattress on instead of just having it on the floor. I bet you have lampshades!
Enough to really argue about it.
i don't really care about whether or not Lena Dunham is fat or whether or not it's OK to say it. I'm of the view that everyone should be allowed to say everything The main focus of my last few posts has been to display to you your own idiocy and hypocrisy, and that's also the focus of this post. I'm at the point where I'm running out of new things to say about Lena Dunham, so now I'm getting my kicks from toying with the mindless cretins who wander in here and start talking out of their ass. Like you, for example.
and if these things you/he/whoever say are true, I can promise I'd have given them a LOT more credence had OP not buried them
It's OP's fault that you don't know what you're talking about and you embarrassed yourself by defedning a child molester? It's OP's job to inform you and it's not your own responsibility? It's so strange the way you frame this point, as though it's OP's fault. You really do seem to avoid taking responsibility, you know that?
Why totally tank your position
Something tells me that OP doesn't really care about his "position" and all he wanted to do was insult Democrats and call Lena Dunham a fat piggy. And who could blame him?
And the effect it had was making her lo1c84ok sympathetic (in my eyes at least)
It's OP's fault that you're a sap and an idiot? With no information of any kind you take the side of the person being called a fatty - the victim, in your eyes. Very illuminating. This is the kind of mindset that Lena Dunham depends on: Paint oneself as a victim to be surrounded by knee-jerk defenders who lack the urge to inform themselves and who will mindlessly defend.
See? I knew this wasn't a waste of time! I've just learned something.
Keep going! This is great! You're a mindless dolt with no ideas and nothing to say and yet you just keep clacking away at that keyboard! It's fascinating to see the thought process of someone who doesn't actually
have
a thought process. This must be what it's like to talk to a tree or a slug or a really warm bail of hay.

I wouldn't know her if she walked into my kitchen - and if these things you/he/whoever say are true, I can promise I'd have given them a LOT more credence had OP not buried them in so much spitefulness aimed at her appearance and weight. Why totally tank your position by coming at everything like a heartless douchebag? I think that's like debate 101. And the effect it had was making her look sympathetic (in my eyes at least) while making him look like an angry and possibly brain-injured child. He/you/they/whoever seem bothered that I don't hate her, too. Enough to really argue about it. It's kooky and suspect.

She admitted to molesting her sister for a decade. She also lied about being raped. In addition, she throws herself into the middle of social issues as if she's an expert.
She's a horrible person who deserves all of the bad things said about her.

wow - u need a hobby and quite possibly a personality transplant!
enjoy dining on your constant feast of
misery

• the people I know who live that way are usually extremely well-balanced and it's not a high horse, just marginally more elevated

if you can't distinguish between someone who uses 100% negativity and language loaded with only degrading perspectives versus someone who casually comments without hostility or vitriol (and usually with something positive or lighthearted to say) then I don't know
OK, from now on, when I call Lena Dunham a fat little piggy I'll try to do it in a more
casual
way, and I'll try to be a little more positive by adding that she seems to be very slightly less physically dirty and repulsive than a real, actual farmyard pig. There. Are my hands clean now, like yours?
i'd be surprised if i outright called anyone a liar
If you really think there's a distinction between calling someone a liar by implying it versus just outright saying it then you're the exact type of weasel that I thought you were when you first rode in here on your high horse and looked down your nose at me.
feel free to dig through my history
It was so easy that it could hardly be described as 'digging'. Here's your thoughts on Ana Kasparian:
She's got a powerhouse body, but this gal's on air persona is oh so grating to me, at least.
It's not that her voice is all that bad on its own, but instead that nearly
everything
she says is focused around her. What she thinks, how she feels, how it impacts her vicinity. Like no other talking head, she seems blissfuly clueless that every topic isn't centered on Ana. It doesn't help that when she does make a topical observation, it's generally the most obvious and clearly regurgitated points. Do-gooder chest-pounding and always highly self-serving - usually centered around her responsibilities as a "
journalist
." Please.
Pretty sure that's what turned me away- literally hearing 10xs what makes a solid journalist - coming from someone I've never seen do even a scrap of actual journalism. Reheating leftovers from HuffPo is what disc jockeys do.
She's literally the
only
person for whom I instinctively reach for the mute button whenever she's on. As a big gay leftie, it's not something that bothers me w/ any other broadcaster - male or female. Yet when I voiced this opinions among friends (who'd never heard of her btw), I was instantly declared a sexist. Of course, only by two silly-minded women lol.
wonder if science will ever identify the gene that compels people to spew online insults about strangers for fun's sake.
any point you might have had gets totally lost in your obsession with body weight and bi-zarre disdain for someone I've barely heard of.
You had fun bashing Ana Kasparian despite the fact that most people have never heard of her, but you're not a hypocrite, somehow, when you come here and look down at us for basically doing the exact same thing to Lena Dunham. The only thing you said about Ana that's even half-way pleasant is that she's got a great body, but obviously the same cannot be said of Lena. So what, are we meant to just skirt around the fact that Lena is a fat little piggy even though we hate her and it's low-hanging fruit? Why mention that Lena is fat at all, right? Why not just leave that part out, right? Well, why mention anything at all about anyone? Why mention that Ana has a
nice
body? Why not just leave it out? Why say anything at all about Ana, why not just go outside and get some fresh air instead? Is any of this sinking in?
you're exagerating my sin while simulataneously downplaying your
I've quoted you verbatim!
You're
downplaying what you'v238e said by calling it "casual" (whatever the hell that's supposed to mean) and by claiming that it's neither vitriolic nor hostile when clearly it is both.
If you chose not to objectively see that distinction, i don't know
You really need to work on that "I don't know" non-point that you keep ending sentences with. If you can't objectively see that you're a hypocrite then I guess it means that you just don't want to see it.

look friend, if you can't distinguish between someone who uses 100% negativity and language loaded with only degrading perspectives versus someone who casually comments without hostility or vitriol (and usually with something positive or lighthearted to say) then I don't know - are you really reading things if you only hear the slant you already want to agree with?
i'd be surprised if i outright called anyone a liar - feel free to dig through my history b/c I won't - so it feels like you're exagerating my sin while simulataneously downplaying your guy using "piggie" and "swine". If you chose not to objectively see that distinction, i don't know how i can help you

You're a hypocrite just like all the others who come here to say that it's wrong to be a meanie. You're a meanie too. You degrade women too. You objectify them. You criticize women who are already having criticism heaped upon them by many other people, and you add your criticism to the pile because you want to indulge yourself.
Ana Kasparian meets my standards of beauty but she's shrill and annoying.
Amy Schumer is a lair and a joke thief and her silence on the subject is proof.
Either of those topics ring any bells? Those are threads that you started. why care about any of it to begin with? don't you have people nearby you can insult and judge in person? fresh air would do you good.

wonder if science will ever identify the gene that compels people to spew online insults about strangers for fun's sake. any point you might have had gets totally lost in your obsession with body weight and bi-zarre disdain for someone I've barely heard of.
why care about any of it to begin with? don't you have people nearby you can insult and judge in person? fresh air would do you good.

The guy she accused has denied any relationship with her, threatened to sue her, the publisher could not confirm any details of her lie, so they agreed to leave that part of it out of future editions.
I wish he would sue her and shut her mouth once and for all.
Not that it would matter. Even if she admitted to making it all up the libtards would still embrace her as being a hero since she talked about campus rape

She's a worse person that David Duke, too. At least he's up front about who he is.

Hillary cares not of a person's overall character
That has been obvious for decades. Not only did she slut-shame the women Bill had affairs with, but she stuck with him when he was sexually assaulting women. She calls herself a feminist, yet her priorities are money and power - and can only be attained through clinging to a man.

Hillary should disavow Lena Dunham the same way Trump disavowed David2000 Duke. Instead, Lena is a speaker at the DNC. It's ridiculous. If Hillary will align herself with the likes of Dunham it's not a very good sign. It says to me that Hillary cares not of a person's overall character but whether or not you can help her to make some righteous bucks, because money and power are the only things that matter and the truth is whatever you can fool people into believing.