I had to go back and look at pictures of her, because I couldn't even picture her body, other than being fit and petite seemingwho said anything about her body, anyways? She still has a hotter body than some random ass girl you'd pick out of the grocery store. I don't see any issue at all?

I think she had beautiful body.

I would do very disturbing things with either one of their undergarments. But with that being cleared up, on a hotness scale, Emily's body = Margot's face, as both are nearly perfect.
If you put Emily's face on Margot's body, it would still make a hot woman of course. Just not quite in the same league of hotness.
Please remember to ensure all your postings are made in compliance with our terms and conditions.

Emily has a butterface

Emily Rajakowaski has the world's best physique, Margot has a lovely face but not a very good body.

Se doesn't have the precis5b4e curves that magazines tell people are ideal. But guess what most women don't have those curves. In REALITY, women don't always come in exactly the same size.
Her face, smile and personality make her one of the most attractive women I have ever seen.

So, she's slim. I'd rather look at her little butt in Harleys shorts than look at Kardashians Hindenberg sized ass any day of the week

Who cares I'm sure its better than their physique. To me everything about her is beautiful.

Yeah, she has a stunningly gorgeous face. Her body isfine, but nothing extraordinary at all, really.
Still don't want her getting any cosmetic alterations though.
+++by His wounds we are healed. - Isaiah 53:5+++

I have nothing against implants as long as they aren't disgusting like Pam Anderson's.
And after seeing Focus I was shocked by how much she didn't fill out that t bikini. Then in SS I came to the conclusion that she does indeed have an unremarkable body. Despite that she is still a 9.5 out of 10.

1. BVS 2. TWS 3. Avenger