I'm tired to see manlet on screen.
And now a new one I'm mean seriously ? If I want to see manlets, I would go to the mall to mog them.

i didnt read as comic books just cartoons ect but always assumed he was around early 20s.

No. We can't. Hollywood likes to repeatedly retell some superheros' origin stories. For example, we've seen Thomas and Martha Wayne shot to death four times already in live-action pictures.

This message has been deleted.

He was, twice already. Maquire and Garfield were in their late 20's/early 30's when they were playing Spidey. But I agree, I would prefer to see a grown man Spider-Man, since I started reading Spidey's comics when he was already an adult.

who would you suggest?
He cant be too old since his still a young adult
filmlife-04472
Is he suppose dto be teenager forever?
No but he isnt a middle aged guy his a young adult
aleksandrk07
He looks 13, sounds 13.5. Like any moment his voice will break into a pre-puberty state.
well spiderman is young
lovelywaz
Tobey Maguire doesn't age, you can take him out of the teenagers list
yeah so youthful and a full head of hair
http://img.duniaku.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Spider-Man-Tobey-Maguire-3.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/07/04/article-2680822-1F609EE700000578-761_634x980.jpg
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2014/07/04/article-2680822-1F639E3F00000578-17_636x382.jpg
Joel_S
I agree Spider-Man has had many great stories as an adult in over 50 years of comic history. Great stories as a kid too, but some of the best Spidey stories came when Peter Parker was an over 21 year old adult. Even 30+ year old adult. But the live action versions always want to snap him back to high school and being a kid whose in the 15-17 year old range
yes they have and look where that took him
Johanna479
They are planning to have him as Spidey for at least the next decade. He will grow into being that more mature Peter Parker over the course of the franchise.
but how long will he be in the role?
manchof1
Putting him back in high school is redundant when the character just graduated in the previous film.
if its done right it will be all right
Look like Tarzan talk like Jane! HAHA

It's the Teenage Spidey that had the huge impact on COmics back in the Sixties,the one that everybody remembers.
And as pointed out,by portraying him as around 16,this is the first Spidey movie that actually has him at the right age when he got his powers.

We did. Their names were Tobey Maguire and Andrew Garfield. Tobey was 27 years old when he played a "teenager." Andrew was 29.
Marvel nailed the casting with Tom Holland. Deal with it.

No one gives a beep if you're an athiest

Oh my god (I'm atheist btw), the reason I visited this page (inl the pic) and it's on top of the thread list. PLEASE, yes.

Not to mention the Tobey films and Andrew films don't exist in MCU.

It's another reboot, dumbass

Putting him back in high school is redundant when the character just graduated in the previous film.

They are planning to have him as Spidey for at least the next decade. He will grow into being that more mature Peter Parker over the course of the franchise.

Guess you don't know much about Spider Man then. He was 15 when he was bitten. As we found out in CW, he's been Spidey for 6 months. You do the math.

I guessed you missed the first two. I guess

No, Spider-Man is a kid..and this new guy nailed it

Well he's our spider-man , nothing to can do about it and there nothing complaining on a message board can do

I agree Spider-Man has had many great stories as an adult in over 50 years of comic history. Great stories as a kid too, but some of the best Spidey stories came when Peter Parker was an over 21 year old adult. Even 30+ year old adult. But the live action versions always want to snap him back to high school and being a kid whose in the 15-17 year old range.
I don't mind Tom Holland, I saw Civil War and Tom surprised me with how great he was with the role. He was very spot on. It is cool and an interesting twist having this kid with all the adult heroes.
He's even younger with his portrayal then either Tobey or Andrew. Tobey and Andrew were going for 17-19 year old Peter Parkers, whereas Tom seems to be going for a 14 or 15 year old.

Spider-Man had many adventure and history as a adult in the comic book he doesn't always have to be a teenager in every live action

Tobey Maguire doesn't age, you can take him out of the teenagers list.

I will agree with you. 2 Spidermans we had were played by older guys. For me as a kid Peter Parker (Tobey) was interesting as not only he was dealing with crime, but grown up problem such as love, friendship and being.. responsible.
Yet after watching CW with Tom Holland, well he is alright. He is not really annoying, but I wish someone of Kick-Ass guy was cast instead.
Also team up with a more adult person with Deadpool could be more fun

He looks 13, sounds 13.5.
No, he doesn't. You've just been sucked in by Hollywood b.s. and their habit of casting 28-year-old actors to play high school students. Thus you're so used to seeing crows' feet at the corners of the eyes of "17-year-olds" that you think anyone without them "looks 13".
Go out into the real world and look again.

because Math is tough, and adjectives are easy.

He looks 13, sounds 13.5. Like any moment his voice will break into a pre-puberty state.