<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Too skinny, and not pretty enough, for Baywatch]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Kelly Rohrbach</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Treuburg</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 04, 2016 12:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This girl has the kind of scrawny, "ugly pretty" look that the fashion industry likes<br />
but Baywatch was always popular because it had a different kind of look in its girls: gorgeous bombshells  "pretty pretty."<br />
This model doesn't come close to the beauty that Erika Eleniak or even Pam Anderson had during their days on the show. Disappointing choice.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/163592/too-skinny-and-not-pretty-enough-for-baywatch</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 20:24:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/163592.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:46:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Too skinny, and not pretty enough, for Baywatch on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:47:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>williamforrest429</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 27, 2016 12:49 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Pitty i guess you all will have to wait for the gay porn parody version.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369639</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369639</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:47:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Too skinny, and not pretty enough, for Baywatch on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:47:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>em745</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 07, 2016 03:43 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">A few idiots ITT are in desperate need of an eye exam:<br />
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3477527/Here-comes-C-J-Parker-Kelly-Rohrbach-stuns-red-bathing-suit-set-Baywatch-remake-Miami.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3477527/Here-comes-C-J-Parker-Kelly-Rohrbach-stuns-red-bathing-suit-set-Baywatch-remake-Miami.html</a><br />
Not that I care about this Baywatch movie, but it seems to me like they made a more-than-decent choice with this new CJ Certainly <em>FAR</em> better than the mustached, chicken-legged fridge that many other morons are/were clamoring for.<br />
This model doesn't come close to the beauty that Erika Eleniak or even Pam Anderson had during their days on the show. Disappointing choice.<br />
Dude, Pam Anderson was a borderline butterface, even on her best day (never mind the obvious fake knockers).<br />
They say genius skips a generation. Mom's a genius, so I guess I'm a genius too</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369638</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369638</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:47:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Too skinny, and not pretty enough, for Baywatch on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:47:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kaliphornia_dreemin</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 05, 2016 07:17 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Agree.  Total ug mug.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369637</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369637</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:47:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Too skinny, and not pretty enough, for Baywatch on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:47:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>wolfbynyt</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 04, 2016 01:49 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Was thinking the same thing. I mean I think she's a pretty girl and all but the women who were on Baywatch were Playboy bunnies, curvy, etc. Kelly has none of what any of them had. But this is Hollywood these days for you so are you really that surprised?<br />
He who makes a beast of himself gets rid of the pain of being a man.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369636</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369636</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:47:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Too skinny, and not pretty enough, for Baywatch on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:46:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>em745</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 07, 2016 04:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I used to think that Kate Upton was perfection<br />
until yesterday when someone posted some non photoshop pics of her<br />
Wow, what a really cool chap to be providing this much needed public service.<br />
Now that16d0 I think of it, I'd rather have Kelly Rohrbach instead.<br />
Mission accomplished.<br />
Personally, a modern adaptation of CJ would go to a fit woman, with a goddess' body<br />
<a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3477527/Here-comes-C-J-Parker-Kelly-Rohrbach-stuns-red-bathing-suit-set-Baywatch-remake-Miami.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-3477527/Here-comes-C-J-Parker-Kelly-Rohrbach-stuns-red-bathing-suit-set-Baywatch-remake-Miami.html</a><br />
For the sake of argument, a "goddess' body" should not include any artificial bits. Rohrbach fits the bill in this case (unlike Anderson).<br />
They say genius skips a generation. Mom's a genius, so I guess I'm a genius too</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369635</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369635</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:46:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Too skinny, and not pretty enough, for Baywatch on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:46:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Crurned</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 05, 2016 05:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I used to thb68ink that Kate Upton was perfection, until yesterday when someone posted some non photoshop pics of her, I almost gagged. True, her best assets are her puppies, but that's it. I will link the thread below. Now that I think of it, I'd rather have Kelly Rohrbach instead.<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/board/11469304/board/nest/250596186?d=250896290#250896290" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.imdb.com/board/11469304/board/nest/250596186?d=250896290#250896290</a><br />
Personally, a modern adaptation of CJ would go to a fit woman, with a goddess' body, the part belonged to Jessica Biel in the early 2000's she just needed to bleach her hair. She was a beauty with or without makeup, and she had a hard body. If TPTB wanted something more exotic, like a Latina, and again we are not looking for Oscar material here, I would go with Jennifer Lopez.<br />
You have been CRURNED!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369634</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369634</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:46:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Too skinny, and not pretty enough, for Baywatch on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:46:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Thenewnexus</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 04, 2016 04:00 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I dont think she is ugly,but she is a terrible choice gor Cj. Kate upton was a fan fav for the role wish she got cast<br />
I'm gonna show you something beautiful everyone screaming for mercy</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369633</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369633</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:46:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Too skinny, and not pretty enough, for Baywatch on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:46:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Crurned</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 04, 2016 12:57 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Girl next door at best, Baywatch was a wank bank of Playboy body level of women. I know it sound mysoginistic, but Baywatch was not Tony Awards material, not to say much on what Baywatch meant to me back then either. I would go with Margot Robbie to fit Pamela Anderson's bra.<br />
You have been CRURNED!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369632</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369632</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:46:55 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>