<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[A wet mop is more attractive]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Jenna Ortega</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>boomjosh</strong> — <em>1 year ago(August 31, 2024 12:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's damn true</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/163632/a-wet-mop-is-more-attractive</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:17:45 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/163632.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:53:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to A wet mop is more attractive on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:53:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Gemini</strong> — <em>1 year ago(August 31, 2024 01:04 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369892</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1369892</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 06:53:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>