<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Is it any good?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — TV General</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Sweetly vulnerable</strong> — <em>4 years ago(February 19, 2022 09:59 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Is it any good?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/165832/is-it-any-good</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 00:26:53 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/165832.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 14:34:17 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Is it any good? on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 14:34:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Sweetly vulnerable</strong> — <em>4 years ago(February 19, 2022 10:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Anyone?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1388765</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1388765</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 14:34:18 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>