<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[00&#x27;s is classic TV????]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Classic TV: The 00s</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>capelladewdrop</strong> — <em>10 years ago(December 17, 2015 06:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">When you get garbage like the X Factor and rubbish game shows that people only go on because they have a chance of winning megabucks. Really?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/166877/00-s-is-classic-tv</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:37:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/166877.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:46:50 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 00&#x27;s is classic TV???? on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:46:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Eyrieze</strong> — <em>10 years ago(April 03, 2016 03:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Rhetorical questions require answers?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1398574</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1398574</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:46:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 00&#x27;s is classic TV???? on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:46:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>capelladewdrop</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 08, 2016 02:49 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Its a shame you can only answer my question with a question.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1398573</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1398573</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:46:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 00&#x27;s is classic TV???? on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:46:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>solex10</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 30, 2016 11:59 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">^^Also, why should the 1950's, 1960's, '70's, '80's, and 90's be the only decades of 'classic' TV?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1398572</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1398572</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:46:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 00&#x27;s is classic TV???? on Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:46:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Sam_Fisher_Agent_47</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 05, 2016 02:05 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Why should a few stupid shows ruin it for the other shows which were actually good??</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto">Steven Seagal Fan Club President</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1398571</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1398571</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 18:46:52 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>