<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[LAW and Order episode- judge hinted to defense to use Substantive Due]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Soaps and Serials</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>opuim_eater</strong> — <em>11 years ago(March 24, 2015 09:53 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Hi, I am new acolyte if L&amp; O and despite i watched the all episodes for 3f or 4th time i still don;t have nice way to recall the episodes.<br />
sometimes by transcripts, by key words.. as bulgarian i am not so familiar with English law, namely "strict scrutiny" substantive due process..amendments, but by episodes i have nice introduction, at least I am able find all this in Wikipedia<br />
So, I am writing to You, demanding some assistance to recall an episode.<br />
it goes like this-<br />
the defense attorney wasn't so good (first criminal court case or something like that) so the judge, female hinted to him "so it is not 4th amendment ..what is next..the 3 words  Substantive Due Process".<br />
I realize that "Savages" is the episode where also we got this in appealing, but I think it is not this episode.<br />
I will appreciate every hint!<br />
thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/167266/law-and-order-episode-judge-hinted-to-defense-to-use-substantive-due</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 16:07:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/167266.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2026 20:15:32 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>