I'm a fan of the comic, NOT a fan of the movie.
If Rorschach had a sister, I'm sure we would have seen her in the flashbacks. Rorschach was almost certainly an only child.
Don't do D&D.

I had mixed feelings towards Watchmen. It was better than most Zack Snyder films.
AC/DC ships Fluttershy and Discord

I didn't like it.
The soundtrack was too lax.
Bob Dylan during the opening credits, Hendrix's Watchtower song during a lift-off.
Good music that's not going to get it done.
This film needed a more aggressive atmosphere, dare I say a maddening one, to match the comedian.
Your sarcasm has driven me to idiocy.

It's my favorite "superhero" movie.
What would you do - trapped in another dimension?

Love the comics. The film wasas good as it could be expected to be. But I agree with Alan Moore that it shouldn't have been made, that his vision was made specifically for the comic form.
I agree with your alignment judgements. I would say that Night Owl is lawful good. Comedian was chaotic good. The real question is how do you see Ozymandias?

I couldn't have said it better. Well, I could, because I am me and you are you, but had I said it, I couldn't say it any better. The cast was great. Really brought the characters to life.
I don't think, therefore I am not.

One of the best "comic book" movies. And I agree with jim; the movie's ending is a big improvement on the graphic novel's.
They bought their tickets, they knew what they were getting into. I say, let 'em crash.

I love both the graphic novel and the movie. One of the rare cases where a change in the movie from the book was actually way better. I thought the ending in the movie was so much better.
"No matter where you go, there you are."

Dawn of the Dead was okay for a remake/reboot. But yeah I agree, don't rate him as a director either.

This really isn't necessarily OT
I think it is.. it's still a superhero movie no matter how you look at it. Not a fan of this, or the director.
Last Film Seen;
The Wailing
(Na Hong-jin, 2016)
7/10

yes, it is great, and the movie was a good adaptation, while inferior.
"It doesnt matter what Bram Stoker has told you dead people don't come back from their graves"

"As I watched it, I thought Snyder completely missed the point of the comic."
How so?
They bought their tickets, they knew what they were getting into. I say, let 'em crash.

Agree 100%.
As I watched it, I thought Snyder completely missed the point of the comic. Ultimately, I agree with Alan Moore on this one - it's a comic that works as a comic, not as a film. Too much had to be sacrificed to fit the run time for one thing (I haven't seen any special additions, btw, so that may be addressed there).
On the plus side, it was a generally 'faithful' adaptation (inasmuch as the plot is generally the same), and I didn't mind the pragmatic change to the villain's plan - the change was better for the film, I feel - and certainly a lot of effort was made to make it look right, but on the whole it was a shallow mess - no substance of note, whilst desperately trying to be worthy and preachy. A bit like most of Snyder's oeuvre, really.
And yes, Malin Ackerman was abysmal

Big fan of the book(s). Don't really like the movie at all. It's like a brainless cliff notes version and I can't stand Snyder's shallow style in it. The cast is really solid though. Except for Malin Ackerman who is astonishingly bad.

Why?
"No matter where you go, there you are."

Who is us? Speak for yourself.
"No matter where you go, there you are."