<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[disapointing new about the last Resident evil.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — 3D Films</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>mmcgee282</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 08, 2017 11:29 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">There was   misinformation that it was shot in a 2 camera .It was way too fluid in the camera movements. the facial close up were not enough depth in between the eyes and the nose.Near the end When i saw the credit ,It stated in the technical department," 2d to 3D conversion by .I forget the company they were adverting at the end .Worst the info in i.m.d technical side .It not state it was 3d converted at all.Studio resent fans wanting them to use the heavy two cameras with crane ,just like it was  used  in Lord of the rings? Non of us film consumers business.I wasted money.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/171449/disapointing-new-about-the-last-resident-evil</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 12:34:04 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/171449.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:20:27 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>