<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Gorilla At Large (1954)]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — 3D Films</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>bloody-3</strong> — <em>9 years ago(April 27, 2016 06:40 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Saw it last night in the flat version on dvd.  It was okay if a bit silly.  According to a poster on the IMDB message board for the film there was a 3-D screening of the movie in New York City on August 14 2010.  Did anyone see it there or in its original release in the 1950's?<br />
<a href="http://www.imdb.com/board/10047041/" rel="nofollow ugc">www.imdb.com/board/10047041/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/171503/gorilla-at-large-1954</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:08:14 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/171503.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:24:44 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gorilla At Large (1954) on Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:24:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mmcgee282</strong> — <em>9 years ago(June 29, 2016 09:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Back in the 82 an anaglyph version was premiered  on local t.v.Although the anaglyph version the color was messed up,the 3D was pretty good ,but active shutter Blu-ray version would be an improvement. It's as silly as the mask.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1438164</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1438164</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 12:24:46 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>