<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It was bad enough that the play was written in 1897 so syncing up everything should still be in living memory in the min]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Woman in Black</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>∂³∑x²</strong> — <em>1 year ago(October 12, 2024 06:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It was bad enough that the play was written in 1897 so syncing up everything should still be in living memory in the minds of the locals in the modernised version<br />
Call me ∑</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/174566/it-was-bad-enough-that-the-play-was-written-in-1897-so-syncing-up-everything-should-still-be-in-living-memory-in-the-min</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 04:23:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/174566.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 13:08:20 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>