<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[What would it be rated today?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Most Dangerous Game</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>whitey_5600</strong> — <em>22 years ago(January 20, 2004 02:33 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Is there any objectionable material in it?  What would it be rated today?<br />
I rock!!!!!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/174844/what-would-it-be-rated-today</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 20:48:30 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/174844.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:35:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What would it be rated today? on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:38:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Rheli</strong> — <em>12 years ago(April 02, 2014 09:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Didn't Zaroff imply that if he won he would take her?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468813</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468813</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:38:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What would it be rated today? on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:37:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>coolbrett</strong> — <em>14 years ago(March 28, 2012 02:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">PG. You've got the shark attacks, arrow in back, impaled on spear, dog stabbing, man falling from balcony, head on plaque. Although it is all very tame. Back then I could see the r rating</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468812</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468812</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:37:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What would it be rated today? on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:37:41 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>alcope2000</strong> — <em>14 years ago(August 09, 2011 12:49 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Totaly agree despite this film having lost all its shock abiliity decades ago. And not all the violence is "implied" either. There is a back-breaking, and implalements, etc. This is PG without a doubt. It was a much stronger film in it's directors cut. It would then be a PG13.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468811</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468811</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:37:41 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What would it be rated today? on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:37:28 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rmm413-1</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 24, 2009 05:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I agree with what some others have said. There is no way that a movie with this subject matter would be rated G, even without profanity, sex, etc.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468810</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468810</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:37:28 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What would it be rated today? on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:37:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>EdwardVP</strong> — <em>1 year ago(January 13, 2025 06:22 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">PG-13 is suggested on IMDb's parents guide for this film, because of some violence.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468809</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468809</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:37:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What would it be rated today? on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:37:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jic-1</strong> — <em>17 years ago(January 24, 2009 08:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In the UK, where it's required by law that DVDs are rated using the current British system, it's rated 12.  That's roughly equivalent to a PG-13, although the two rating systems don't line up exactly.  I'd say that about 75% of the time, a PG-13 movie will be rated 12 on UK DVD.<br />
Movies I've Seen:<br />
<a href="http://imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=25003655" rel="nofollow ugc">http://imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=25003655</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468808</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468808</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:37:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What would it be rated today? on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:36:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>deedeemv</strong> — <em>17 years ago(April 26, 2008 01:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">How about when he stabbs the dog and throws it off the cliff? Or when the hero murders the Russian by putting him in some hold and snapping his back. Definitely not rated 'G'.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468807</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468807</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:36:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What would it be rated today? on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:36:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>hasb0031</strong> — <em>18 years ago(January 27, 2008 05:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">A movie with such grim subject matter would not be rated "G", even by today's criteria.  Plus the floating head in the jar and the arrow wound would warrant at least a "PG" rating.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468806</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468806</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:36:38 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What would it be rated today? on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:36:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>iscream22</strong> — <em>19 years ago(February 14, 2007 07:24 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">There wouldnt be any need for profanity.  Just grisly violence<br />
<em>for shizzle</em></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468805</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468805</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:36:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What would it be rated today? on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:36:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tiptoptyler</strong> — <em>19 years ago(January 13, 2007 09:36 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">if they did remake it, it would definately be an R rating.<br />
they would very gruesome, with scenes in the movie that make you jump.<br />
there would definately be profanity.<br />
but, most likely no sex.<br />
if they did remake it, they should stick with the original story and not put the girl in there.<br />
i like the short story way better than how the movie was.<br />
[well, these grass stains on my knees they won't mean a thing.]</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468804</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468804</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:36:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What would it be rated today? on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:36:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>TOMMYismyhomeboy</strong> — <em>19 years ago(September 12, 2006 04:47 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">it would be cool to see it with a pg-13 ratingthere's the intense three day hunt when rainsford sets all those traps for zaroff like the tiger spikes and the knife that flies at ivan. when zaroff is thrown out the window to the dogsit would just be more intense and funtrue to the vibe of the original story. idk lol<br />
STUPID BUNNIES! YOU BROUGHT NO MATES!  - watership down</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468803</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468803</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:36:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What would it be rated today? on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:35:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ReganRebecca</strong> — <em>20 years ago(January 02, 2006 07:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's very tame by modern standards. I agree with the G rating.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468802</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468802</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:35:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What would it be rated today? on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:35:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>koolkidz-1</strong> — <em>21 years ago(September 06, 2004 07:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">G  no sex, no profanity, no violence on screen (it's implied)</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468801</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1468801</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 19:35:46 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>