<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Does the short story imply]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Most Dangerous Game</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>catpaw-4</strong> — <em>17 years ago(April 18, 2008 09:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That Rainsford continues hunting people in place of general Zaroff?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/174934/does-the-short-story-imply</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 15:05:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/174934.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 22:29:21 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Does the short story imply on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 22:29:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nellybly-3</strong> — <em>17 years ago(April 19, 2008 10:19 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I realize that taking over Zaroff's bed might seem to imply that Rainsford also took over Zaroff's obsession but I think it only means that Rainsford got his revenge. He won. Zaroff was hoist on his own petard, so to speak.<br />
The movies are the only business where you can go out front and applaud yourself.<br />
Will Rogers</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469515</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469515</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 22:29:35 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>