<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Ugh—- *spoilers*]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Female</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>beetiesmom</strong> — <em>12 years ago(October 05, 2013 06:56 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Way back then, I guess this was quite a titillating film~~~a woman (<em>gasp</em>) as head of a giant automobile factory, running things just like a man supposedly would, with sexuality in over-drive (was this supposed to be "like a man", too?), a voracious appetite for men and power, then, sick of it all, she decides to become The Little Woman, eager to give over her entire industry to a lowly employees she's seen to be chasing all over creation, (notice she has to best him even then, in a shooting game) and agreeing to give the new boss a pile of children and be his hausfrau. Yuck.<br />
The staging was eye-popping, beautiful people, gowns, furnishings, etc., but ugly and unfulfilling (we are to believe) in reality, I feel the message being "Ma'am, you have no business hereget back home and put your apron on and let the menfolk do the thinking around here".  Of course, the only person who can get away with murder around the boss-lady is a small, meek, homely Englishman, who flirts with all the girls, pours the boss' tea and makes silly remarks.  OK, I'm done now</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/174945/ugh-spoilers</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 03:46:11 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/174945.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:01:17 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ugh—- *spoilers* on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:02:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mdonln</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 14, 2017 10:05 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">FilmKoala says &gt; Yeah, it was ridiculous. A huge step backwards.<br />
Someone please tell us what would have been a good ending for this movie since so many of you think the one it has is so bad. Tell us something that would have represented a step forward; what you would have liked to have seen. I honestly would love to know.<br />
Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan.<br />
[Tarzan and his mate]</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469669</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469669</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:02:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ugh—- *spoilers* on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:02:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>FilmKoala</strong> — <em>11 years ago(August 03, 2014 11:21 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yeah, it was ridiculous. A huge step backwards.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469668</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469668</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:02:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ugh—- *spoilers* on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:02:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mdonln</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 14, 2017 10:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Devans00 says &gt; It kind of makes you wonder how "pathetic" people were that they needed the "happy ending" of a woman taking herself down a notch or two. Why couldn't she be ambitious and put her job above being a breeder?<br />
So it's more important to you that she make cars rather than babies and a home for her family. What would have been a happy ending in your view or are you saying go with a non-happy ending? Perhaps she could have been shown making a big deal with the bankers to save her ailing company or maybe losing the company, having no life and flinging herself from her office window. Who doesn't love a movie that ends like that?<br />
Woman, man! That's the way it should be Tarzan.<br />
[Tarzan and his mate]</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469667</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469667</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:02:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ugh—- *spoilers* on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:02:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Devans00</strong> — <em>9 years ago(January 12, 2017 03:12 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">dianezelazny<br />
Ugh is right. When that man said a woman should not run a co. I about screamed. It was the times then but the ending still was bad.<br />
It kind of makes you wonder how "pathetic" people were that they needed the "happy ending" of a woman taking herself down a notch or two.  Why couldn't she be ambitious and put her job above being a breeder?<br />
No two persons ever watch the same movie.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469666</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469666</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:02:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ugh—- *spoilers* on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:02:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dianezelazny</strong> — <em>12 years ago(March 26, 2014 09:40 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ugh is right.  When that man said a woman should not run a co. I about screamed.  It was the times then but the ending still was bad.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469665</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469665</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:02:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ugh—- *spoilers* on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:01:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>joeparkson</strong> — <em>12 years ago(March 22, 2014 10:44 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I was frustrated by the ending because<br />
he didn't ask her to give up running the company; she gave it to him and told him she'd be raising children. What was up with that? She'd never shown the slightest interest in children up to that point!<br />
Absurdity: A Statement or belief inconsistent with my opinion.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469664</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469664</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:01:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Ugh—- *spoilers* on Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:01:32 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Schlee25</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 01, 2013 11:29 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">At first I was frustrated with the ending too. But I've been thinking about it, especially the thing Thorne said about her being four different women. To me the real Alison is the CEO and the gal bringing home the guys for "meetings". If there had been an epilogue or 2 years later thing at the end, I think it would have shown her back at work. She would have gotten bored and frustrated with Thorne and acting the way she thought he wanted her to be.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469663</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469663</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 23:01:32 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>