<![CDATA[I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Invisible Man

ProudTraitor — 14 years ago(February 22, 2012 12:24 PM)

I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved some of this.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/174996/i-was-really-surprised-how-good-they-were-for-a-1930s-movie-what-do-you-think-i-still-don-t-know-how-they-achieved-somRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 22:12:33 GMTSun, 26 Apr 2026 00:02:27 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:07:26 GMT]]>AnthonyRocks — 4 years ago(December 09, 2021 05:18 PM)

"I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie."
———————————–
Agreed, They were very impressive.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469933https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469933Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:07:26 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:07:11 GMT]]>ronricho-337-128165 — 9 years ago(October 18, 2016 01:34 PM)

It isn't just that the FX are so good its a good movie in every way. I'm not sure this could be redone and made better. Of course having Claude Rains as the lead certainly doesn't hurt any.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469932https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469932Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:07:11 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:06:57 GMT]]>MayoGalway — 9 years ago(August 26, 2016 09:33 PM)

Checkout the trivia pg. It tells of the first(?) "green screen", only it's black. Go.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469931https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469931Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:06:57 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:06:43 GMT]]>Jamie170 — 10 years ago(June 06, 2015 10:04 AM)

Agreed, I could not get over how good they looked when I first watched the film knowing the film was 80 years old. It is my favourite of the Universal Horror series.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469930https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469930Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:06:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:06:22 GMT]]>FridayOnElmStreet — 10 years ago(May 25, 2015 03:32 AM)

I fully agree.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469929https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469929Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:06:22 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:05:55 GMT]]>cybopath — 11 years ago(October 25, 2014 02:24 PM)

1930's gave us this, Jack Pierce's Frankenstein and Willis O'Brien's King Kong. Many of these techniques didn't change until the 90's only refined.
They are pretty impressive especially as some movies made in the 50's and 70's had some shockingly poor effects.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469928https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469928Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:05:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:05:28 GMT]]>snickz — 11 years ago(October 14, 2014 05:33 PM)

I agree. I didn't expect them to be as good as they were.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469927https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469927Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:05:28 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:04:46 GMT]]>snickz — 11 years ago(October 14, 2014 05:33 PM)

I agree. I didn't expect them to be as good as they were.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469926https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469926Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:04:46 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:04:17 GMT]]>DracTarashV — 12 years ago(June 18, 2013 06:51 PM)

If you think the effects look great now, just imagine how mind-blowing they were
back then.
They hold up tremendously.
Hey there, Johnny Boy, I hope you fry!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469925https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469925Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:04:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:03:43 GMT]]>DracTarashV — 12 years ago(June 18, 2013 06:51 PM)

If you think the effects look great now, just imagine how mind-blowing they were
back then.
They hold up tremendously.
Hey there, Johnny Boy, I hope you fry!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469924https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469924Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:03:43 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:03:16 GMT]]>ElectricWarlock — 13 years ago(October 15, 2012 11:04 AM)

I agree. Today they would just use CGI objects moving around the room and it would look so fake. The effects in this movie actually looked real.
Come, fly the teeth of the wind. Share my wings.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469923https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469923Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:03:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:02:56 GMT]]>westal_sage — 13 years ago(September 13, 2012 01:35 AM)

Agreed. Very well done!

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469922https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469922Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:02:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I was really surprised how good they were for a 1930s movie. What do you think? I still don't know how they achieved som on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:02:41 GMT]]>felstein — 14 years ago(March 14, 2012 01:21 PM)

I agree. Still impressive.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469921https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1469921Sun, 26 Apr 2026 00:02:41 GMT