<![CDATA[I really liked it. I was very impressed. The main thing that got me was the effects look better in 1933 than much of tod]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Invisible Man

FridayOnElmStreet — 10 years ago(May 25, 2015 03:30 AM)

I really liked it. I was very impressed. The main thing that got me was the effects look better in 1933 than much of todays CGI.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/175055/i-really-liked-it-i-was-very-impressed-the-main-thing-that-got-me-was-the-effects-look-better-in-1933-than-much-of-todRSS for NodeSun, 17 May 2026 07:12:38 GMTSun, 26 Apr 2026 02:58:10 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I really liked it. I was very impressed. The main thing that got me was the effects look better in 1933 than much of tod on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 02:58:41 GMT]]>FridayOnElmStreet — 10 years ago(July 07, 2015 11:04 AM)

Same.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1470613https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1470613Sun, 26 Apr 2026 02:58:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I really liked it. I was very impressed. The main thing that got me was the effects look better in 1933 than much of tod on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 02:58:26 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1470612https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1470612Sun, 26 Apr 2026 02:58:26 GMT