<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Musical number]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Ready, Willing and Able</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>jamerson5</strong> — <em>15 years ago(April 12, 2010 04:06 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The production number "Too Marvelous for Words" from this film can be seen on You Tube.  Type "classic hoofing on a giant typewriter".</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/175298/musical-number</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 14:10:12 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/175298.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:31:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Musical number on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:31:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>EdwardVP</strong> — <em>1 year ago(January 30, 2025 12:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ruby Keeler is fabulous on the giant typewriter set dancing to Too Marvelous For Words. I suppose the typewriter was a pun for the song title.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1472283</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1472283</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:31:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Musical number on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:31:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>PussyCrusher_Principal</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 19, 2016 11:02 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Ahh! That's exactly why I came here, to say that she was fabulous in the typewriter number, as was her partner, and that all the talk about her dancing like she was killing bugs in 42nd Street was not representative of all her abilities.<br />
If you thought she was even awful in this scene I don't think we'll ever see eye to eye on Ruby Keeler. Oh well, differences of opinion keep the world spinning.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1472282</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1472282</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:31:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Musical number on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:31:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>redbrioche</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 19, 2016 08:37 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Too bad Ruby Keeler Jolson was never able to dance.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1472281</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1472281</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:31:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Musical number on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:31:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>beckeis</strong> — <em>14 years ago(January 05, 2012 09:41 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">And what GREAT set piece that was!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1472280</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1472280</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 08:31:31 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>