<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Why has a movie this good been allowed to go out of print on DVD?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Wuthering Heights</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>critic-2</strong> — <em>14 years ago(December 15, 2011 06:14 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It is unconscionable that we have so many movies that stink readily available on DVD, and "Wuthering Heights" is not. You'd think Turner would help out in this.<br />
Watching it on TV is no good either. The current print shown on TCM has horrible sound towards the end.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/175506/why-has-a-movie-this-good-been-allowed-to-go-out-of-print-on-dvd</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 01:58:15 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/175506.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:54:12 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>