<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It is unconscionable that we have so many movies that stink readily available on DVD, and &quot;Wuthering Heights&quot; is not. Yo]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Wuthering Heights</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>critic-2</strong> — <em>14 years ago(December 15, 2011 06:14 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It is unconscionable that we have so many movies that stink readily available on DVD, and "Wuthering Heights" is not. You'd think Turner would help out in this.<br />
Watching it on TV is no good either. The current print shown on TCM has horrible sound towards the end.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/175507/it-is-unconscionable-that-we-have-so-many-movies-that-stink-readily-available-on-dvd-and-wuthering-heights-is-not-yo</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 01:58:22 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/175507.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 13:54:20 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>