<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Gable was supposed to get top billing for this but Crawford would not allow it.  The film really showcases him more than]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Strange Cargo</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>netshopper-2</strong> — <em>15 years ago(June 29, 2010 03:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Gable was supposed to get top billing for this but Crawford would not allow it.  The film really showcases him more than her. He should have had top billing.  By then, he was a more bankable star as well.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/175534/gable-was-supposed-to-get-top-billing-for-this-but-crawford-would-not-allow-it-the-film-really-showcases-him-more-than</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 22:24:21 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/175534.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 14:17:21 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Gable was supposed to get top billing for this but Crawford would not allow it.  The film really showcases him more than on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 14:17:29 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bedrock1960</strong> — <em>10 years ago(October 07, 2015 02:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I can see by all the supportive posts you've received throughout the past 5 years how many out there agree with you.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1474569</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1474569</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 14:17:29 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>