<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Hated it]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Citizen Kane</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>heisenberg12</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 06, 2017 11:25 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">So disappointed. Gave this a hopeful shot first time ever last night, and I really couldn't stand it.<br />
By today's and recent decades' standards, poor editing and so cheap. Pace was beyond boring.<br />
Thing is I can usually find the redeeming qualities in older black and white movies, but I really couldn't find any in this. I can list 10 movies of old far better than this, and people call this the greatest of all-time?<br />
Sorry to those who love it. To me, this is another movie way overhyped so everyone pretends to like it because if they don't, they're afraid they'll be looked at as stupid or having bad tastes since it's always in top 10 lists, if not number one recently.<br />
I actually hated this movie. I thought it was awful.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/175611/hated-it</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 21:32:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/175611.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:51:33 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hated it on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:52:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jriddle73</strong> — <em>4 years ago(March 23, 2022 02:57 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The op was written 5 years ago; watch it again in five more years, when you turn 18. Maybe you'll get it then.<br />
"The Dig"<br />
<a href="http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://cinemarchaeologist.blogspot.com/</a></p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1475210</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1475210</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:52:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hated it on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:52:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>pglynn</strong> — <em>4 years ago(March 22, 2022 09:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">That's your opinion; I thought it was very good</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1475209</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1475209</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:52:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hated it on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:51:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>preachcaleb</strong> — <em>4 years ago(March 22, 2022 08:40 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">By today's and recent decades' standards, poor editing and so cheap. Pace was beyond boring.<br />
Gotta disagree with that. Even by today's standards, the editing is great with an engaging pace, and the production design is fantastic.<br />
So many stories, so little time.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1475208</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1475208</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:51:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hated it on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:51:51 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kaneforgov</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 10, 2017 07:16 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Classic film is not for everybody.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1475207</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1475207</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:51:51 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Hated it on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:51:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>theuserformerlyknownasfrantruff</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 06, 2017 11:45 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">To each their own I guess. Personally, it's one of my favourite movies, but since it's a character study, I can easily see how someone wouldn't like it.<br />
The thing I can't understand is your complain about bad editing. To me, Kane is a technically perfect film, full of great images, great camera movements and great transitions. Could you elaborate on that?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1475206</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1475206</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 15:51:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>