<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[What is the real story…]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Frankenstein Meets the Wolf Man</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>rixrex</strong> — <em>14 years ago(July 23, 2011 11:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">For those of you who hope one day to see the deleted scenes in a restored to original script version of Frankenstein meets the Wolfman, well, you're probably going to be waiting a long time because they likely do not exist. Yes, it's a terrible thing, but this is not a matter of a lost film where a print might exist in an old ditribution warehouse or vault, like Mystery of the Wax Museum, but it was an intentional removal of material prior to public release.<br />
However, the actual storyline is available, and it explains the reason why Lugosi was selected to play the monster and why the monster is a lumbering giant.<br />
The most pertinent missing scenes are these:<br />
Early on, the Monster and Talbot (Wolfman) have a sit-down chat, where the Monster speaking with Lugosi's Ygor voice explains the terrible circumstances that led to his brain being placed in the Monster.  The lying and sinister Ygor tells it in a way to seem sympathetic to Talbot, and Talbot sees Ygor as the Monster as akin to the Wolfman, helplessly trapped in the body of a creature.  This scene is most important as it establishes the rapport between the two, explains the Monster's blindness (carried over from Ghost of Frankenstein) and lets us know why the Monster is lumbering and clumsy with outstretched arms.<br />
Later on Ygor, as the Monster, speaks with the attending Dr. Mannering that while it's okay to drain the Wolfman of life, as Talbot wants, the Dr. should do everything he can to keep Frankenstein's creation alive.  Remember, Ygor had a manner that allowed him to be sympathetic and to manipulate others without showing his true nature and intentions.  Mannering agrees.<br />
In the climactic lab scene, Ygor regains his sight after being strengthened by Mannering's procedures.  He makes this known and reveals his real intentions to go back and murder all who treated him poorly, which leads to a reversal of Mannering draining the life from the Wolfman, and strengthening the beast in order to battle the newly able-to-see Ygor Frankenstein Monster.<br />
There you have it, and now it should all make sense.<br />
Many see this as a much better plot from writer Curt Siodmak, who knows what he's doing, than the eventual chopped-up film that we now have from a committee of Universal execs.  Their reasoning was to improve pacing, so they said, but there were many who felt that a Frankenstein Monster with a lucid mind, even though still murderous, would be a mistake and would remove all possible sympathy for the creature (like that really mattered).  And still others thought it was too weird to have the Monster speak with what was recognizable by the public as the voice of Dracula.<br />
For whatever reasons they did it, with perfect 20-20 hindsight we can now say that they shouldn't have done it, because the Monster with the brain of Ygor would've been a real terror.<br />
The Eyes of the City are Mine!<br />
Mother Pressman / Anguish (1987)</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/175920/what-is-the-real-story</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 15:05:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/175920.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:29:29 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What is the real story… on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:30:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jbirtel-1</strong> — <em>14 years ago(February 28, 2012 09:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">According to writer Curt Siodmak, who was present at the studio screening:<br />
the film was playing very well UNTIL the Monster began to speak.<br />
What happened next was that the brass went into severe laughter that turned doubled-over hysterical during the final Larry/Monster exchanges.<br />
Fearing that much of the public, unfamiliar with the storyline established in the previous (Ghost of) entry, they did a panic edit.<br />
This was why director Roy William Neil was not offered to direct HOUSE OF FRANKENSTEIN.<br />
Little matter, as he was pretty busy with the Rathbone/Bruce 'Sherlock Holmes' films.<br />
Imagination is one thing.<br />
But unless those filmed deleted scenes ever surface, no one can be certain how well those scenes played and how severe the unintentional laughter really is.<br />
Until it's seenjudgement is impossible.<br />
According to Curt, their removal saved the film.<br />
And he was all in favor of deleting those scenes after what he witnessed.<br />
Your information was insightful on why Mannering reverses the electrodes to give the Wolf Man strength. I have the revised script dated 3/31/42 that excludes the Monster's intention and the electrode reversal; so it's very likely that scenario is in one of the other drafts. A real eye opener. Thanks!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1477963</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1477963</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:30:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What is the real story… on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:29:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tbrittreid</strong> — <em>14 years ago(November 29, 2011 01:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">powerscrow:<br />
Thank you for this explanation.This plot would have allowed more depth &amp; characterization for the monster &amp; made the storyline a richer one.One thing that always puzzled me though.If the monster was blind just how was it able to help Talbot find Frankenstein's Diary of Life &amp; Death which was hidden behind the bookcase?<br />
That is indeed the proverbial fly in the ointment here; the Monster even points the way once in this sequence, the same one with Chaney-as-Talbot's totally unconvincing dubbed-in line, which is surely part of the post-production tampering. And how does the Monster find his way into town by himself if he was supposed to be blind? I just can't reconcile this with the official story.<br />
The GREEN HORNET Strikes Again!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1477962</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1477962</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:29:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What is the real story… on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:29:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>powersroc</strong> — <em>14 years ago(November 15, 2011 06:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thank you for this explanation.This plot would have allowed more depth &amp; characterization for the monster &amp; made the storyline a richer one.One thing that always puzzled me though.If the monster was blind just how was it able to help Talbot find Frankenstein's Diary of Life &amp; Death which was hidden behind the bookcase?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1477961</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1477961</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:29:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What is the real story… on Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:29:38 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nilbog_king</strong> — <em>14 years ago(August 14, 2011 07:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thanx for posting this. I always wondered what the original dialogue of the monster was like for this film and I was particularly interested in what the monster would have been like if they allowed him to be dominated by the brain and personality of Ygor. This really gives me an idea of the film would have been if they had stuck with the original script.<br />
self-respect is simply the act of respecting your own wants and needs.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1477960</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1477960</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 22:29:38 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>