<![CDATA[I never get sick of this movie !]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Shadow of a Doubt

RvaBread22 — 10 years ago(February 16, 2016 02:42 PM)

I know people ponder on why Hitchcock liked this film so much. They consider it "average thriller" or whatever. But I can see why he did . There's something about the film that is very intriguing and timeless- even to this day. Its the perfect blend of superficial sweetness with dark subtext. The pacing is great, the acting and script is phenenomenal. Its just a really good story. I have seen many other Hitchcock movies- including "Psycho" but I don't desire to watch them over and over the way I do this one.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/176000/i-never-get-sick-of-this-movieRSS for NodeFri, 15 May 2026 05:16:21 GMTMon, 27 Apr 2026 00:22:10 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I never get sick of this movie ! on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:22:41 GMT]]>amyghost — 10 years ago(February 20, 2016 05:18 AM)

Agreed. There are so many layers to this film, you keep finding nuances in it with every viewing. It's a simple (and yes, brief) mystery/thriller on the face of it, but Hitchcock and Wilder added so many things going on below that surface that it grabs you anew each time.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478742https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478742Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:22:41 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I never get sick of this movie ! on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:22:32 GMT]]>RvaBread22 — 10 years ago(February 22, 2016 09:59 AM)

A lot of "film noirs" tended to be short (under 2 hours). The movie "Laura" is also short. I guess maybe they felt people didn't want to be held in suspense for long periods of time . However, I think maybe its being shorter makes me want to watch it over and over again. Its a good film to watch when you are short on time, lol.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478741https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478741Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:22:32 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I never get sick of this movie ! on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:22:21 GMT]]>hilaryjrp — 10 years ago(February 19, 2016 04:31 PM)

Neither do I. It's problem is that it's too shortway way WAY too short. For its era, I can understand the brevity, and the film still packs a punch because of the mixture of dread with daily all-American life. But it's too brief, so that young Charley's dread isn't sufficiently realizedfor the viewer in 2016.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478740https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478740Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:22:21 GMT