<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Shadow of a Doubt</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>derozz24</strong> — <em>18 years ago(February 26, 2008 08:33 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I thought this movie was way before its time. I've seen alot of Hitchcock and I gotta put this up in his top 5. Don't know why it took me so long to see this one.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/176008/do-you-put-this-movie-in-hitchcock-s-top-5</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 08:31:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/176008.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:28:44 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:35:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jdown-1</strong> — <em>13 years ago(July 20, 2012 09:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I definitely agree, Franz.  Sloppily done, with everyone doing goofy things contrary to common sense and logic.  One of Hitch's 5 worst.  The 8.1 rating here is a real head-scratcher.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478832</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478832</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:35:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:35:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>dizexpat</strong> — <em>15 years ago(December 08, 2010 11:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">For what it's worth (and some of the comments here make me wonder if responding is worthwhile) my Hitchcock Top Ten shows the film making it into the Top Five.<br />
Vertigo<br />
Psycho<br />
Rear Window<br />
Notorious<br />
Shadow of a Doubt<br />
North by Northwest<br />
The Birds<br />
Strangers on a Train<br />
Frenzy<br />
The Lady Vanishes<br />
"I am embarrassed. I never made love in Technicolor before."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478831</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478831</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:35:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:35:27 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>KateofKateHall</strong> — <em>15 years ago(October 17, 2010 08:39 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes! Here's my list (out of the Hitchcock movies I have seenmany more to go!):</p>
<ol>
<li>Rear Window</li>
<li>Rebecca</li>
<li>Shadow of a Doubt</li>
<li>Rope</li>
<li>North by Northwest<br />
my super-dainty Kate</li>
</ol>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478830</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478830</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:35:27 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:35:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>franzkabuki</strong> — <em>15 years ago(September 29, 2010 05:01 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Upbeat is one thing, but here everyone but Cotten is reduced to a majorly annoying walking caricature. The balance is completely off and instead of highlighting or stressing the tension, all darkness simply dissolves in the allaround goofiness. What a film like Blue Velvet gets about right, ASOD misses by a mile.<br />
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478829</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478829</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:35:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:35:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kikiteka</strong> — <em>15 years ago(August 11, 2010 03:08 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">But that was the point!  They're all upbeat and good natured with a healthy outlook on life, and he'snot.  The contrast between Uncle Charlie and his family is<br />
supposed<br />
to be pronounced.  He grew up in the same environment as his sister, and she's fine, which implies that it's not their upbringing that causes him to be this way.  It's just him, which makes him scarier because he's completely unpredictable.  Not only that, the sort of dizzy behavior of the family ensures that everyone is just completely oblivious to this guy who has serious problems, and the only person who notices is Little Charlie.  Hence the tension!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478828</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478828</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:35:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:35:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>g-nicol27</strong> — <em>15 years ago(June 02, 2010 05:13 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I completely agree.   The family was a (bad) joke, his sister was just irritating, and even more irritating<br />
was the way Charley Junior couldn't walk anywhere without flouncing - whether happily when<br />
she met him at the station, or frantically on her way to the library, and in fact most times when she walked.  I found this body over-acting distracting.  Daft plot.  NOT one of his best.   Ginger</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478827</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478827</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:35:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>franzkabuki</strong> — <em>15 years ago(April 28, 2010 06:36 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think it belongs firmly among the 5 worst films Hitchcock ever made.<br />
In short, what he did was create a character as fascinating, unique and compelling as Uncle Charlie, have this character played by a great actor and then throw him into a complete f-cking cartoon. Throughout the  entire film he is surrounded by an army of one-dimensional, preposterously chipper caricatures of zero nuance or interest. Everyone is so ridiculously upbeat that the mere news of Uncle Charlies arrival is greeted with shockwaves of collective euphoria by the entire family. And then they babble - boy do they babble. The entire film is filled with endless yacking, dished out in bouts of stiff overacting; only very occasionally is some suspense or more appropriately sinister atmosphere allowed to creep in.<br />
And then we have this silly device of having that horrible little man Hume Cronyn rain in from time to time to cheerfully hobnob about how to kill people - presumably to highten tension (a clumsy move he also repeated in Strangers On The Train). What it does however is cheapen the thing by taking it down onto a dimestore pulp novel level. And so it goes just about everything is constantly undercut by inappropriate overacting. Very rarely is there an actual air of danger - when Cottens presence is allowed to occupy the center stage. Dont happen too often though - Im afraid the only way to save this movie would have been for Uncle Charlie to strangle the entire family (minus the Charlie chick, of course) as well as Cronyn right upon arrival.<br />
In addition to all that the film has to offer 2 of the most risible "assassination attempts" in all of Hitch - first, a wooden staircase is broken (apparently the broad should have died of a twisted ankle or a broken leg) and then setting up a gas chamber expecting the victim simply to walk into it. And, of course, theres the ending which looks every bit as silly as its reputation suggests. 4/10.<br />
"facts are stupid things" - Ronald Reagan</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478826</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478826</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:53 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>OpaqueOne</strong> — <em>15 years ago(April 11, 2010 03:58 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">To the OP,<br />
Without a doubt! This not only makes it into my top 5 Hitch filmsit's # 2 just behind Psychoit is one of my all time favorite films.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478825</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478825</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>beteigeuse</strong> — <em>16 years ago(January 23, 2010 08:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Definitely not!<br />
1.Vertigo<br />
2.The Lady Vanishes<br />
3.Dial M for Murder<br />
4.Spellbound<br />
5.North by Northwest</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478824</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478824</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lanepryce</strong> — <em>16 years ago(January 23, 2010 04:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I only saw 6 films of himbut still no lol!<br />
my top 5 is<br />
Psycho<br />
Rear Window*Vertigo -tie-<br />
Rebecca<br />
Rope<br />
and this comes 6th</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478823</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478823</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sublimer13</strong> — <em>16 years ago(January 16, 2010 12:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes. Favorite film of all time.<br />
Shadow of a Doubt<br />
Vertigo<br />
Rebecca<br />
Strangers on a Train<br />
Rear Window<br />
Do not mourn Ted Kennedy. Remember Mary Jo Kopechne.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478822</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478822</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:09 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>vanityfair_713</strong> — <em>16 years ago(December 15, 2009 09:31 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes definitely. In terms of both story and execution. Aside from being a totally   exciting movie to watch.<br />
Dial M for Murder<br />
Shadow of a Doubt<br />
The Lady Vanishes<br />
Rear Window<br />
Notorious<br />
Personally, I think I have too much bloom. Maybe that's the trouble with me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478821</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478821</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:09 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sentimental-education</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 01, 2009 09:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I've seen nearly every Hitchcock film and this one is my absolute favorite.<br />
It's incredibly underrated, in the same way "Rope" is.<br />
Both perfect films in my opinion.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478820</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478820</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:34:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>minerva-23</strong> — <em>16 years ago(October 20, 2009 12:09 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I haven't seen all of his movies, but of the ones I have seen, this is my 5:<br />
1 Rear Window<br />
2 Shadow of a Doubt<br />
3 Strangers on a Train<br />
4 Vertigo<br />
5 Notorious<br />
I LOVE so many other movies though!  It's hard to choose only 5.<br />
Also:  Why no love for Strangers on a Train?  I think it's fantastic</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478819</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478819</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478818</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478818</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478817</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478817</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:35 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jgiannantoni05</strong> — <em>16 years ago(September 05, 2009 11:02 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I can see why Shadow is Hitchcock's personal favorite.  It is in my top 5.  But I'll admit a slight partiality to the "charming killer" Hitchcock films.  My list evidences this partiality.<br />
My top 5 Hitchcock (no particular order):<br />
Notorious<br />
Psycho<br />
Shadow of a Doubt<br />
The 39 Steps<br />
Rope<br />
Vertigo may make this list, needs a rewatch.  The Lady Vanishes is not far from this top 5.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478816</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478816</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sublimer13</strong> — <em>16 years ago(August 30, 2009 10:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It ties for the top spot on my list with Rebecca.<br />
Do not mourn Ted Kennedy. Remember Mary Jo Kopechne.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478815</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478815</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kikiteka</strong> — <em>16 years ago(August 16, 2009 09:58 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Absolutely!  It's way ahead of it's time.  There is so much between the lines, and it's absolutely crammed with symbolism.  You can't possibly see it all in one viewing.  I've seen it several times and every time I see it, I notice something else.  Just the other day I noticed that when Uncle Charlie greets his sister for the first time, her young son and daughter are standing in front of them, a reflection of how they see each other.  Big sister, baby brother.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478814</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478814</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>the_crawl4</strong> — <em>16 years ago(June 01, 2009 11:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">absolutely- its a tie for second for me</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478813</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478813</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:33:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:32:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>djsnafu23</strong> — <em>16 years ago(May 30, 2009 09:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Wow, exactly what Saltedut says! Weird, thjats my top 5 too. Rope 1st though.<br />
<a href="http://myspace.com/bankrupteuropeans" rel="nofollow ugc">myspace.com/bankrupteuropeans</a><br />
Coz lifes too short to listen to Madlib</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478812</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478812</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:32:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:32:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Itsamoomoo</strong> — <em>16 years ago(May 17, 2009 05:30 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Absolutely not! "Psycho," "The Birds," "Rope," "Strangers On a Train," and "Dial M For Murder" are so much better than "SOAD."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478811</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478811</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:32:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:32:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>maxman-5</strong> — <em>16 years ago(May 15, 2009 02:20 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No, not me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478810</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478810</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:32:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Do you put this movie in Hitchcock&#x27;s top 5? on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:32:26 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>advice31765</strong> — <em>16 years ago(April 17, 2009 09:34 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No, I like it a lot and I don't make a ranked list of Hitchcock films but I can think of 5 I like better.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478809</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1478809</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 00:32:26 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>