<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[FLAW in plot really ruins this]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Shadow of a Doubt</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>aciolino</strong> — <em>11 years ago(October 12, 2014 06:27 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">If the police/FBI are so sure about Uncle Charley's guilt, or if they even have a strong suspicion, they would be in their rights to bring him in for questioning and to have his damn photo taken for I.D. purposes, and all this chicanery would be avoided.<br />
Bad job on the part of Thurber, Hitch.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/176025/flaw-in-plot-really-ruins-this</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:14:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/176025.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:09:22 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to FLAW in plot really ruins this on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:10:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>rsgre</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 31, 2015 12:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks everyone, I like this film too, but the plot is weak in a few places. The fact that there are,conveniently, two suspects under investigation, and just because the other one ran and gets killed, Uncle Charlie is off the hook ?  The other one is: how in the world would the niece explain her uncle's death on the train in a satisfactory and realistic manner without admitting the truth ? He just<br />
"accidentally fell off the train??". Good movie though<br />
RSGRE</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479063</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479063</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:10:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to FLAW in plot really ruins this on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:10:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jeffeastwood15</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 29, 2015 03:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">What makes even less sense is that Uncle Charlie would freak out about that article in the newspaper. Why would he think anyone in the family would think the story was about him? If there was a photo of him, yeah, but otherwise it just made no sense.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479062</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479062</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:10:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to FLAW in plot really ruins this on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:10:31 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kenny-164</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 10, 2015 09:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I had to agree that this film was a bit lax about the plot and its development.<br />
Still, great work by the director and cast. I especially thought Teresa Wright was great in this.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479061</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479061</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:10:31 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to FLAW in plot really ruins this on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:10:23 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Ironman54</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 04, 2015 08:56 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">IMHO, the flaw was Uncle Charlie anticipating that Charlie would go out to the garage, alone no less, so he could asphyxiate her  lame, lame, lame. And I love this film !!<br />
I just try to not think about it</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479060</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479060</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:10:23 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to FLAW in plot really ruins this on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:10:14 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Ironman54</strong> — <em>10 years ago(August 04, 2015 08:28 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Devils Advocate: Maybe they didn't wanna spook him until they had a solid case. Bringing him in for questioning/printing/photographing and then some high $ lawyer getting him out from a temp holding cell might have been something they wanted to avoid. If they got his photo surreptitiously and a grand jury ran with it, it would have given a Judge enough to withhold bail.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479059</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479059</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:10:14 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to FLAW in plot really ruins this on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:10:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>lubin-freddy</strong> — <em>11 years ago(February 01, 2015 05:50 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Plots never really interested Hitchcock, and were more a means to the end(s), more than anything else.<br />
Don't lend your hand to raise no flag atop no ship of fools.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479058</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479058</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:10:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to FLAW in plot really ruins this on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:09:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>js5905</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 18, 2015 12:53 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I can't see two detectives deferring the arrest of a homicidal maniac for any reason.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479057</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479057</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:09:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to FLAW in plot really ruins this on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:09:48 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>renatom1</strong> — <em>11 years ago(December 27, 2014 06:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Well, we know that that one detective had a thing for young Charlie.  Maybe his wanting to get into the house to interview the family had more to do with meeting young Charlie than apprehending old Charlie.  You think?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479056</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479056</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:09:48 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to FLAW in plot really ruins this on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:09:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Starcraft_rules</strong> — <em>11 years ago(December 14, 2014 07:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">They explained it as having to do it carefully so that the mother wouldn't die of shock or something. Pretty weak, I agree.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479055</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479055</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:09:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to FLAW in plot really ruins this on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:09:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>amyghost</strong> — <em>11 years ago(October 13, 2014 03:46 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">His screenwriter was Thornton Wilder, not James Thurber.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479054</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1479054</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:09:30 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>