<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[isn&#x27;t it amazing how]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Clash by Night</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>moosefeathers</strong> — <em>16 years ago(August 11, 2009 07:12 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">how Mae got into town right after they found a dead baby under the bridge?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/176900/isn-t-it-amazing-how</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 00:37:59 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/176900.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:09:24 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to isn&#x27;t it amazing how on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:09:52 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>best_of</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 26, 2015 01:18 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">In the movie this is a real loose end. It suggests that some other scene (s) ended up on the cutting room floor. The play is by Clifford Odets, not a man to be frivolous or negligent. Recall that the whole business was in the newspaper, it is raised, then nothing happens. Who knows? Also, inconsistent, was the baby it appears, then disappears. One point characters came back from the bar or some place and the baby is nowhere in sight. Altho the kid really was just a device to add to Stanwyck's motivation, and it shows up Robert Ryan's callousness. The dialogue in the film is razor sharp, and movie really under rated.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485639</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485639</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:09:52 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to isn&#x27;t it amazing how on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:09:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>PenTheater</strong> — <em>12 years ago(January 24, 2014 09:37 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">they mentioned the dead baby under the bridge,<br />
and later a little girl that drowned.<br />
I think this was to put a subconscious idea in our mind that when he left the house with the baby at the end that something bad was going to happen<br />
a little more drama til the end.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485638</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485638</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:09:42 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to isn&#x27;t it amazing how on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:09:33 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>toshguy</strong> — <em>15 years ago(October 09, 2010 09:43 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Keen observation! Never thought of that. Naturally, I assumed it was something to set the mood, but if you really start to think about, it could mean something, intetntionally or not.<br />
I'm here, Mr. Man, I can not tell no lie and I'll be right here 'till the day I die</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485637</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485637</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:09:33 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>