<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[tough chick]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Clash by Night</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>zygimantas</strong> — <em>20 years ago(December 26, 2005 08:15 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">hey, Stanwyck is cool - she plays the hardboiled "seen it all" chick well, her wit is razor sharp and she ALWAYS comes out on top in the repartee.  Mae rivals any of Bogart's characters for shoot-from-the-hip glib comebacks.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/176916/tough-chick</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 16:11:38 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/176916.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:32:20 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to tough chick on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:33:34 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>HarlowMGM</strong> — <em>14 years ago(April 07, 2011 06:41 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think this is Stanwyck's best 1950's film.  What's really great about it is that it's one of the very few films of it's era that's a full-blooded sex melodrama with blatantly middle-aged stars.  Stanwyck's Mae Doyle has clearly been around the block a few times and still has her passion and fire if not her youth and dreams.  I think Barbara deserved an Oscar nomination for this but 1952 was a very tough year, the winner was Shirley Booth in COME BACK LITTLE SHEBA which was Stanwyck's personal alltime favorite film performance.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485786</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485786</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:33:34 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to tough chick on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:33:25 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>HoferPM-1</strong> — <em>15 years ago(June 01, 2010 08:55 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">There's a lot of inuendo in this film.  Barbara always at her best in these movies.  Remember, 1952 had a hard time showing Barbara was bored with Jerry and liked a bit of the rough stuff from Robert Ryan who didn't know how to handle women and finally found a woman who liked the way he offered love, or should I say sex,   In the end she realized the safe way was the best !!!!!!!!  P.S. Marilyn Monroe was adorable and I loved her hairdo.  Barbara Stanwyck had great arms, well defined.  Loved this whole movie and saw it when I was a kid so I know it appeals to the over 50 crowd.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485785</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485785</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:33:25 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to tough chick on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:33:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>candries-1</strong> — <em>18 years ago(June 12, 2007 11:05 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Stanwyck is very sexy in this. The movie was excellent for the first 45 mins but then it dropped for me. I think it's rated only 7 because the ending became just a bit dramatic, no real resolve somehow. The acting was excellent from everybody but ultimately the story was meek for me.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485784</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485784</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:33:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to tough chick on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:33:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>AlanSquier</strong> — <em>19 years ago(February 28, 2007 08:04 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I sure would've expected a higher rating from the 45+ crowd.<br />
I killed him for money and for a woman. I didn't get the money and I didn't get the woman.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485783</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485783</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:33:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to tough chick on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:32:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>BlueGreen</strong> — <em>19 years ago(January 30, 2007 01:33 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It's as simple - or as complicated - as that. <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f609.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--wink" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=";)" alt="😉" /><br />
It's sexist, but very true to the era (so it's a good thing); and the actors do their best to avoid any unnecessary pathos or "sappiness", as it is usually called by the vulgo;)<br />
I wonder, too, why it has such a low rating.<br />
I think it's one of the best American films of the era.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485782</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485782</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:32:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to tough chick on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:32:49 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>msilva7-1</strong> — <em>18 years ago(March 29, 2008 10:49 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">YOU CAN'T ACCOUNT FOR BAD RATINGS IN HERE WHEN THERE ARE MILLIONS OF IDIOTS OUT THERE.  YOU SHOULD KNOW THIS.  GO FIND SOME REAL PROFESSIONAL REVIEWS OF THIS FILM AND THEN MAKE YOUR CONCLUSION.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485781</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485781</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:32:49 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to tough chick on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:32:39 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>T-aerial</strong> — <em>19 years ago(January 29, 2007 05:05 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think Stanwyck is at her best in this hot film!<br />
I fully agree, however, why this film has such a low rating?<br />
Beacause it's not 100% a "Noir", and more a "Drama"?<br />
The 1-shots  and the other camera-shots are excellent, Stanwyck shows her best performance; overall an excellent, underrated film.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485780</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485780</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:32:39 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to tough chick on Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:32:30 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>inoldhollywood</strong> — <em>19 years ago(December 05, 2006 10:42 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I think Stanwyck is at her best in this hot film!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485779</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1485779</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 18:32:30 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>