<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Sentences]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Elevator to the Gallows</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>sc_taylor</strong> — <em>15 years ago(October 16, 2010 04:35 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Loved this movie, despite the many plot holes already discussed here. Moody, cool and very French.<br />
But why did the policeman at the end say that Tavernier would have received the death penalty for the motel murders, but only 10 years for murdering Carala? (it can't be "crime passionel" - which does exist in the French system - because there was no sudden impulse caused by an extreme emotional situation).<br />
Then, even more strangely, he says Mme Carala will get 20 years (more than her husband's murderer!)<br />
The French justice system must be very odd indeed.<br />
Anyone care to explain?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/177375/sentences</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 12:43:30 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/177375.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:22:34 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Sentences on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:22:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Eric-1226</strong> — <em>14 years ago(May 10, 2011 11:23 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">You gotta figure the police were going to charge Madame Carala with masterminding the murder of her husband, manipulating Julien to do the dirty work. Since she had been married to an arms dealer - which carries a connotation of ill-gotten gains, i.e. wealth derived on the backs of other peoples misery - you can bet there would be no public sympathy for her at trial. Whereas Julien, an ex-paratrooper who had fought in two of Frances recent wars (Algeria and IndoChina) would at least have public sympathy, as the paratroops were held in high esteem by the public. So its doubtful the police would have bothered with putting the entire guilt on him. Florence Carala was the bigger and juicier villain in this matter. The prosecutor would have sought, and probably would have gotten, a more severe sentence for her. A bit of politics involved, safe to say.<br />
Now, with my machine, I cut your head off in the twinkling of an eye, and you never even feel it!<br />
Joseph-Ignace Guillotin</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488401</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488401</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:22:35 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>