<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[possible spoiler:]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Elevator to the Gallows</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>mgr2000</strong> — <em>19 years ago(June 28, 2006 12:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">possible spoiler:<br />
WHO do you think took the photographs (taken at some unknown earlier time) of Florence &amp; Julien together as a happy couple that were developed at the conclusion.<br />
I tend to doubt that a small 1950's camera would have a self-timer feature.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/177378/possible-spoiler</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 01:20:24 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/177378.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:22:57 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to possible spoiler: on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:13 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tanner3212001</strong> — <em>16 years ago(November 25, 2009 06:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The camera was Julien`s I would assume he and Florence took them it was a fancy spy camera <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /> Remeber the guy who stole his car.. his girlfriend found it in the secret agent mans car. Hence the spy camera <img src="https://filmglance.com/discuss/assets/plugins/nodebb-plugin-emoji/emoji/android/1f642.png?v=8570fb93240" class="not-responsive emoji emoji-android emoji--slightly_smiling_face" style="height:23px;width:auto;vertical-align:middle" title=":)" alt="🙂" /><br />
I've got a job, a secretary, a mother, two ex-wives and several bartenders that depend upon me</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488423</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488423</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:13 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to possible spoiler: on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:12 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>nutsberryfarm</strong> — <em>15 years ago(March 30, 2011 06:56 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">or miles davis.<br />
Golf clap? Golf clap.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488422</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488422</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:12 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to possible spoiler: on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:10 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jackamaku</strong> — <em>19 years ago(November 27, 2006 07:26 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Hi,<br />
I used to work in a camera store years ago and we handled a lot of used cameras.  We actually had one of those old "spy" cameras once.  Although I don't remember specifically whether it had a timer on it, most cameras had a port for a cable release (the cable attached to the camera that would fire the shutter from several feet away, also there used to be a separate self-timer mechanism that you could buy and screw in to the cable release port that would fire the shutter as well, for cameras without self timers.  So its completely conceivable that they could have taken the photos themselves.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488421</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488421</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:10 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to possible spoiler: on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>marbleann</strong> — <em>19 years ago(August 01, 2006 05:26 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I always thought the tourist took them.  They had 3 pictures left.  So what was the other pictures on the film other then of those two.  Obviously Julien hung out with Florence in public because the guy in the bar mentioned that he knew her from Julien.  So it is very likely the tourist just happen to take their picture. THe movie is full of coincidenses and happenstance.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488420</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488420</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to possible spoiler: on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ChimpCadet</strong> — <em>19 years ago(July 09, 2006 01:10 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">if it bothers you so much that you need rationalization, then here it is:  yes cameras did have self timers in the 60's.  i dont know when they were actually invented, but they have been around for a while.  (for example, i have an olympus om-1 35mm slr camera made in 1972 with a self-timer).  of course they werent all digital and sophisticated as they are now, but they worked just the same.<br />
so, they could have set it up on a rock or tripod to time.  or, they could have been with friends (which wouldnt have been uncommon for this cheating couple since they hung out together with that one drunk dude).  i wouldnt let it bug you because it was obviously such a minor detail that they didnt feel the need to rationalize it at all.<br />
"Don't ever listen to anyone on IMDb except ChimpCadet."</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488419</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488419</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to possible spoiler: on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>sm1909</strong> — <em>15 years ago(June 14, 2010 10:45 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">couldn't be the drunk friend. when she spoke with him at the bar before she bought his friend a royal cocktail, he acted as if he didnt know she was quite involved with julien.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488418</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488418</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to possible spoiler: on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ubersleuth</strong> — <em>16 years ago(July 19, 2009 11:48 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I would agree with this, though it could be implied that the drunk friend or some other friend took them at some point. The photographs are required, since they are the only time Julian and Florence are together on-screen, a parallel to Vronique and Louis being together only on the front page of a newspaper after they go to jail.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488417</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488417</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to possible spoiler: on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDb User</strong></p>
<p dir="auto">This message has been deleted.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488416</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488416</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:23:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to possible spoiler: on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:22:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>theRabidChild</strong> — <em>19 years ago(July 01, 2006 05:54 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I suspect this is one of those movie cheats (or goofs), like when people are watching old home movies that seem to have been shot from multiple angles<br />
Your days of plenty are numbered</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488415</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488415</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:22:59 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>