<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Specifically, the plot. Whenever it&#x27;s mentioned, all that&#x27;s ever said is that a script was written in the early sixties,]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Attack of the 50 Foot Woman</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>joe_538</strong> — <em>10 years ago(February 22, 2016 10:15 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Specifically, the plot. Whenever it's mentioned, all that's ever said is that a script was written in the early sixties, it would have had a bigger budget, and been shot in color and Cinemascope.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/177437/specifically-the-plot-whenever-it-s-mentioned-all-that-s-ever-said-is-that-a-script-was-written-in-the-early-sixties</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 02:59:40 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/177437.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:50:25 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>