<![CDATA[Wow, the special effects were terrible]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Attack of the 50 Foot Woman

FilmKoala — 11 years ago(July 06, 2014 03:19 PM)

Those big, obviously rubber hands? Ugh.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/177454/wow-the-special-effects-were-terribleRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 12:33:41 GMTTue, 28 Apr 2026 01:52:03 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Wow, the special effects were terrible on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:52:07 GMT]]>jkholman — 10 years ago(May 18, 2015 08:24 AM)

All of which make this a fun film to watch.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488904https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488904Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:52:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Wow, the special effects were terrible on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:52:06 GMT]]>MikeyEvan — 10 years ago(April 18, 2015 12:01 PM)

Note how the Christine wagon turns into a Woodie wagon when the alien destroys it.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488903https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488903Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:52:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Wow, the special effects were terrible on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:52:05 GMT]]>FilmKoala — 11 years ago(August 01, 2014 09:29 PM)

Ugh, how could I forget that?
"Ram this in your clambake, bitchcakes!"

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488902https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488902Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:52:05 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Wow, the special effects were terrible on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:52:04 GMT]]>tony_ginorio — 11 years ago(July 17, 2014 08:16 AM)

That's nothing. What about the fact that they used double exposure for the process shots, resulting in transparent giants?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488901https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1488901Tue, 28 Apr 2026 01:52:04 GMT