she created the situation she was in, then tried to run over a cop to avoid accountability for her actions
the hypothetical is not actually a hypothetical. it's a real situation. the cop sustained a flesh wound and returned fire. the suspect that shot him was running away after he fired the first shot into the cop's cheek. the cop unloaded into the suspect's back and killed him. the cop was treated for the bullet wound to his face and went home the same day.
was the cop justified or not?
the point is to test your axioms. the only reason you won't answer is because you know it contradicts your view that vehicles can't be used as lethal weapons and that people who have shown they are willing to commit violence shouldn't be stopped.
jestergooning

Why does it matter? She was speaking initially, and then she was leaving. The original video shows what's happening, and she didn't try to run him over.
He could've moved out of the way.
Again, not comparable, so I'm not entertaining this hypothetical.
Even if you think she was wrong, this didn't call for lethal force. She was already driving away. He was clearly okay enough to fire shots.
Get the boot out of your throat, ******.

She tried to leave when the other cop started yelling at her to get out of the car and tried opening her car door.
My password is password.

Because most of them never have and never will **** a pussy.
My password is password.

My password is password.

". . . take the last train to Retardsville,
Boomshit will meet you at the station. . . ."

they have to be reminded, being the delusional retards they are
My password is password.

Is this a rhetorical question?

why are MAGA incels such ****ing pussies?
My password is password.

why didn't she leave when he was on the other side of her car and her path was clear? she had many opportunities but only chose to slam the gas when he circled all the way back around to the front
but back to the point. is the cop justified to respond with force if the bullet only causes a flesh wound?
jestergooning

No one put a gun in a cop's face, and this isn't comparable. She was trying to leave. See Holly's point.
He was salty for being teased.

if someone puts a gun in a cop's face and pulls the trigger, but the gun is actually aimed at his cheek and technically it won't kill him (only a flesh wound), does that mean he shouldn't respond with lethal force?
jestergooning

I'm glad she's dead, and so is she. She's ****ing Charlie Kirk in Hell.
My password is password.

No, and if you think so, you're retarded and/or psychopathic. Look at the original video. He was not in danger. The pig's video shows a lot of motion, but you can't see what's going on when it happens.
Eat ****, bootlickers.

It is a bad idea to give those retards guns, but it is an even worse idea to mess with a retard who has a gun.
So with that in mind, be afraid of me.

No. It seems dumb to go out of your way to **** with or mock a low level government retard with a gun, but it wasn't justified.
My password is password.

by BOOMSHIT » January 14, 2026 09:31 PM
Member since August 6, 2024
I take losing positions because I have an IQ issue. I was born stupid.

by BOOMSHIT » 33 minutes ago(January 14, 2026 09:50 PM) | Send PM | Reply | permalink
Member since August 6, 2024
I have a single IQ point so I support the shooting

kys!
jestergooning

I win times 100
My password is password.

I win
jestergooning

No u
My password is password.

too bad you're wrong and I'm not
jestergooning

Anyone with over a single IQ knows she wasn't trying to run any police over and that the cop that shot her wasn't in any danger of being run over.
My password is password.