<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Kramer&#x27;s best?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Inherit the Wind</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>I_Aint_No_Prophet</strong> — <em>15 years ago(October 26, 2010 08:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">As great as his other work is, this certainly competes for the top spot. What does everyone else think?<br />
"Why do you find it so hard to believe?"<br />
"Why do you find it so easy?"<br />
"It's never BEEN easy!"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/178868/kramer-s-best</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 18:01:50 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/178868.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 04:51:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kramer&#x27;s best? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 04:51:08 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>FuzzyCanyon</strong> — <em>3 years ago(June 27, 2022 01:40 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Storywise? A resounding yes.<br />
Cast? Aside from the two leads, adequate.<br />
Production values.  Fair.  The sets could have been much better.  And why not sepia tone?<br />
Although one of my most favorites that I watch continually, I can't help feeling it is rushed.  I would never tell anyone not to watch this however.  It should be required viewing.<br />
I may be twisted, but I'm not miserable.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1500344</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1500344</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 04:51:08 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kramer&#x27;s best? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 04:51:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>SamoanJoes</strong> — <em>11 years ago(January 25, 2015 02:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Judgment at Nuremberg.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1500343</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1500343</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 04:51:07 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kramer&#x27;s best? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 04:51:06 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Yorick_Brown</strong> — <em>12 years ago(January 05, 2014 06:55 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I saw this film only earlier tonight and I can't stop gushing about it.<br />
However, his follow-up movie and fellow courtroom drama, "Judgement at Nuremberg" (1961), is his greatest masterpiece.<br />
Ribbons and detours meant nothing to me<br />
Swaying our sympathies, pulling our strings</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1500342</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1500342</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 04:51:06 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Kramer&#x27;s best? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 04:51:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>bradford-1</strong> — <em>12 years ago(December 24, 2013 07:51 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I usually don't think of Kramer as too "cinematic" a director, but there are some very subtle camera moves and dissolves here that rank with the masters.<br />
"May I bone your kipper, Mademoiselle?"</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1500341</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1500341</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 04:51:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>