<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Rewatched Psycho II for the first time in 2yrs]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Psycho</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>dilophux</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 04, 2017 07:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Its better than i remembered, i think i may slightly prefer it over this now.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/179037/rewatched-psycho-ii-for-the-first-time-in-2yrs</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 16:30:07 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/179037.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:17:04 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Rewatched Psycho II for the first time in 2yrs on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:17:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tsrts</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 05, 2017 11:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Psycho II was decent, but it really benefited from people's extremely low expectations for a sequel.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1502035</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1502035</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:17:05 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>