<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Its better than i remembered, i think i may slightly prefer it over this now.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Psycho</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>dilophux</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 04, 2017 07:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Its better than i remembered, i think i may slightly prefer it over this now.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/179038/its-better-than-i-remembered-i-think-i-may-slightly-prefer-it-over-this-now</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 17:49:33 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/179038.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:17:06 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Its better than i remembered, i think i may slightly prefer it over this now. on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:17:07 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>tsrts</strong> — <em>9 years ago(February 05, 2017 11:50 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Psycho II was decent, but it really benefited from people's extremely low expectations for a sequel.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1502037</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1502037</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:17:07 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>