"Learn to read."
Unbelievable . . .

Where and when did I ask for your opinion of this movie as a whole or of Audrey Hepburn? Not only that, but you also completely dodged the question I originally asked. Learn to read.
The movie can't be "so bad, so plain awfully bad" if it has a 88% on Rotten Tomatoes. 88% is pretty high, and there's a reason why it's so highly regarded by people.
"Overhyped" as an actress? That's not Audrey Hepburn and Natalie Portman; that sounds more like Elizabeth Taylor and Ellen Page. Audrey and Natalie are brilliant. And how can someone be "overhyped" in sophistication?

This film was so bad, so bad, so awfully plain bad.
You'd have to have lived through the sixtiesas a very young kid, hippie, adult with a familyto know how self-satisfied that decade was toward the end. The era was revolting, as this movie is.
I started and stopped it at least ten times, and then finally let it play while I was cleaning. Audrey Hepburn was the Natalie Portman of her dayway way overhyped as an actress and as a sophisticate.
Then she throws the cat out of the car, and the bimbo-guy professes undying love.
What a piece of beep