<![CDATA[7.2? Lmao]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — El Cid

DonnerParty808 — 17 years ago(April 12, 2008 11:30 PM)

You seriously have to not know what a great movie this is to rate it low. This movie is definitely a top 250 and one of the greatest movies of all time. Scorsese himself has even said this is the greatest epic in cinema history.
Check out my videos!
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=FilmMiracle

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/179285/7-2-lmaoRSS for NodeTue, 12 May 2026 16:14:19 GMTTue, 28 Apr 2026 05:53:04 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to 7.2? Lmao on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:53:09 GMT]]>ccr1633 — 15 years ago(March 10, 2011 05:08 PM)

victorsuk wrote:
"For such a supposedly great film, i have never heard of El Cid."
Probably political correctness in action. You don't see the 1986 comedy "Soul Man" on tv much either.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1504382https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1504382Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:53:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 7.2? Lmao on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:53:08 GMT]]>ChuckHestonFan — 15 years ago(January 31, 2011 08:35 AM)

Haven't even heard of El Cid? Oh my, it's such a classic!
Join the Charlton Heston forum:
http://charltonhestonforums.freeforums.org/index.php

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1504381https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1504381Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:53:08 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 7.2? Lmao on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:53:07 GMT]]>victorsuk — 15 years ago(January 15, 2011 07:52 AM)

For such a supposedly great film, i have never heard of El Cid. But i just turned my tv on and this film was an hour in, and i was thinking it looks like it would be a good film, shame i missed the first hour so i will watch the other channel instead, and kangaroo jack was just starting which was pretty good.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1504380https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1504380Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:53:07 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 7.2? Lmao on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:53:06 GMT]]>dslacker — 17 years ago(May 22, 2008 02:27 PM)

Tastes do change. For example showing the same 1000 extras riding thru shot after shot after shot got more than a little boring to this 21st century viewer. The ending was brillant - it just needed to come at the 130 minute mark instead of the 180 minute mark.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1504379https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1504379Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:53:06 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to 7.2? Lmao on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:53:05 GMT]]>sparker1 — 17 years ago(May 02, 2008 05:51 PM)

Tastes change. It's a pure romance in an age of irony. I'm not surprised that today's viewers don't rate it very highly.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1504378https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1504378Tue, 28 Apr 2026 05:53:05 GMT