<![CDATA[Gleason's performance in 'Requiem' is far better]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Hustler

jrl0726 — 12 years ago(March 14, 2014 07:29 PM)

Gleason got all the high praise in this film too early. It was before his far superior role in the great "Requiem For a Heavyweight" (1962). In that magnificent Serling inspired film all four (Quinn,Gleason,Harris,Rooney) of the main performances were brilliant. That was the performance he should have got nominated for, not this one. His role in this one was tiny in comparison.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/179378/gleason-s-performance-in-requiem-is-far-betterRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 13:04:37 GMTTue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:49 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to Gleason's performance in 'Requiem' is far better on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:56 GMT]]>kag2-1 — 10 years ago(February 20, 2016 09:44 AM)

Gleason had a smaller role in The Hustler, but played it to near perfection with his facial expressions. With a large role in Requiem, Gleason again was excellent.
I guess you could argue for either one.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505415https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505415Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:56 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gleason's performance in 'Requiem' is far better on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:55 GMT]]>jrl0726 — 10 years ago(October 18, 2015 07:56 PM)

His "performance" in The Hustler was not as good BECAUSE IT WAS both SMALLER and MORE SIMPLE. Those are two of the main things which differentiate the level of film "performances".

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505414https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505414Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:55 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gleason's performance in 'Requiem' is far better on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:54 GMT]]>movies789 — 10 years ago(October 15, 2015 12:02 PM)

You're confusing "role" and "performance". Gleason's role in Requiem was more complex than in Hustler, but his performance was just as good in both.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505413https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505413Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:54 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gleason's performance in 'Requiem' is far better on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:53 GMT]]>rtw416 — 11 years ago(February 18, 2015 10:17 PM)

Gleason acted inRequiem.In the Hustler he was just playing himself.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505412https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505412Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:53 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gleason's performance in 'Requiem' is far better on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:52 GMT]]>jrl0726 — 11 years ago(September 09, 2014 06:45 PM)

"Requiem" was a superior film with four great performances and a brilliant Rod Serling screenplay. There's no way Gleason's performance was as good in "Hustler". As I said, it was more like a cameo in comparison to his "catalyst" role in "Requiem".

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505411https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505411Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:52 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gleason's performance in 'Requiem' is far better on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:51 GMT]]>scorsese-1 — 11 years ago(September 02, 2014 03:11 AM)

He is better in The Hustler. Less dialogue but spot on expressions and emotion. He is great in this and deserving of the nomination. As an addendum i think this is movie has one of the finest screenplays in movie history.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505410https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505410Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:51 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to Gleason's performance in 'Requiem' is far better on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:50 GMT]]>joshua_carpino — 12 years ago(March 21, 2014 05:39 AM)

he didn't have much screen time,but i find his performance as fats to be much more rewarding. but it's two completely different kinds of performances,and i don't blame anyone for preferring requiem. it's certainly meatier,and i do love his "go home" speech at the end.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505409https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1505409Tue, 28 Apr 2026 06:09:50 GMT