<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[It&#x27;s not a good movie]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Manchurian Candidate</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>lisztnet</strong> — <em>11 years ago(January 23, 2015 06:01 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Awful slow pacing so that i'm finish with the plot. I don't need 2 guys going through same dreams, i'm not a dumb ass needing 2 times the same demonstration. This is under every thing comparable, S. Fuller movies or Dr. Strangelove eventually. How it gets 8.1, i wonder !<br />
The acting is under B series level, completely wooden, in fact there is no acting, only reading text. First time in my life i see this.<br />
Really how someone can like this kind of movie, maybe someone can explain ? And how it get 8,1, why not 11 ?<br />
Frankenheimer or Frankenstein ? I cant wait 2h for watching the end, if the end is redeeming the movie. Sorry.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/179781/it-s-not-a-good-movie</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 05:53:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/179781.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:18:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s not a good movie on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:05 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>jjj58205-1</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 28, 2016 02:46 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This guy is a troll.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509830</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509830</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s not a good movie on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:04 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Jetfire1959</strong> — <em>10 years ago(March 18, 2016 02:00 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Have you ever encountered a person who was already unlikable and then was turned into a robotic killer through brainwashing? Probably not. So what qualifies you to say Mr. Harvey's acting was so bad. I found his performance quite credible. Are you a paid actor?<br />
Eventually, there will come a day when science acknowledges the supernatural</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509829</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509829</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:04 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s not a good movie on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:03 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Trax-3</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 22, 2016 05:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Who do think was such a poor actor? Sinatra, Lansbury, Harvey? They were all absolutely outstanding.<br />
Sinatra is good, Lansbury is more than OK, Harvey is pretty bad. There's quite a bit B level acting here. The movie as a whole has some interesting imagery but can get a bit cartoonish at times.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509828</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509828</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:03 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s not a good movie on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>mauro-26</strong> — <em>10 years ago(December 27, 2015 03:08 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Lemme guess. OP is a male between age 22 to 30 and thinks Forrest Gump and Shawshank Redemption are classics. Also believes Citizen Kane is a snoozefest and doesn't understand the big deal about Taxi Driver.<br />
No, he is Forrest Gump.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509827</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509827</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s not a good movie on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:02 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>puplover</strong> — <em>10 years ago(December 15, 2015 11:03 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Lemme guess. OP is a male between age 22 to 30 and thinks Forrest Gump and Shawshank Redemption are classics. Also believes Citizen Kane is a snoozefest and doesn't understand the big deal about Taxi Driver.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509826</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509826</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:02 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s not a good movie on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:01 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>llanwydd</strong> — <em>10 years ago(December 08, 2015 06:47 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Who do think was such a poor actor?  Sinatra, Lansbury, Harvey?  They were all absolutely outstanding.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509825</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509825</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:01 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s not a good movie on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:00 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Pzachlen</strong> — <em>10 years ago(December 05, 2015 10:37 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">It is so over rated. Some very poor acting.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509824</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509824</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:19:00 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s not a good movie on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:18:59 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>kaneforgov</strong> — <em>10 years ago(July 10, 2015 09:24 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Correct- it's a GREAT movie!</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509823</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509823</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:18:59 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s not a good movie on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:18:58 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>MystMoonstruck</strong> — <em>10 years ago(June 05, 2015 08:06 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This is "not a good movie"?! Well, I've seen it at least 50 times throughout the past 50+ years, and I'm watching it again on Encore. I was going to switch over to TCM to watch a movie I've never seen before, one I was looking forward to viewing.<br />
But, I became so engrossed in this "not good" film and missed the switch-over time! I'm still watching, too! TCM just has to wait this time it seems.<br />
Now, why would I forget that I wanted to see another movie, film buff that I am? How silly! After all, this is "not a good movie"~right?!<br />
(W)hat are we without our dreams?<br />
Making sure our fantasies<br />
Do not overpower our realities. ~ RC</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509822</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509822</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:18:58 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s not a good movie on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:18:57 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>patrick_bateman_90056</strong> — <em>9 years ago(July 30, 2016 03:17 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I can't say I agree. The original will always be the true masterpiece, but I thought the remake operated well in a modern setting with an equally insidious and treasonous plot.<br />
"[Redmayne] is so thirsty for awards and not in a fun way but in a sad, desperate way" - Twitter</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509821</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509821</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:18:57 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s not a good movie on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:18:56 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>novastar_6</strong> — <em>11 years ago(January 25, 2015 02:48 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">No, it's the remake that's not a good movie. THIS is cinematic gold.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509820</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509820</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:18:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s not a good movie on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:18:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>llanwydd</strong> — <em>11 years ago(January 24, 2015 10:21 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">&lt;</p>
<blockquote></blockquote>
<p dir="auto">Amazing.  Did you and I see the same film?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509819</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509819</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:18:55 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to It&#x27;s not a good movie on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:18:55 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>movieghoul</strong> — <em>11 years ago(January 23, 2015 10:00 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Awful slow pacing so that i'm finish with the plot. I don't need 2 guys going through same dreams, i'm not a dumb ass needing 2 times the same demonstration<br />
Because if they only showed it happening to one guy, it might just be a dream. You need two to show it really happened.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509818</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1509818</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:18:55 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>