<![CDATA[So why did the communists use only one soldier?]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Manchurian Candidate

wordsatplaytoday — 9 years ago(July 08, 2016 02:14 PM)

Why go to all that bother brainwashing all those men and only use one?

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/179797/so-why-did-the-communists-use-only-one-soldierRSS for NodeThu, 14 May 2026 13:58:30 GMTTue, 28 Apr 2026 07:21:46 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to So why did the communists use only one soldier? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:21:47 GMT]]>IMDb User

This message has been deleted.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1510007https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1510007Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:21:47 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to So why did the communists use only one soldier? on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:21:47 GMT]]>Sponiatowski — 9 years ago(July 08, 2016 04:52 PM)

They all had different roles to play in getting the real communist players into power. Not only that, but their civilian lives weren't even remotely close to the senators and Presidentsonly that one soldier was in position to do the job.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good (wo)men to do nothing.
E. Burke

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1510006https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1510006Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:21:47 GMT