<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[3&#x2F;10. Here&#x27;s why:]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Tales of Terror</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>IMDB_Vits</strong> — <em>9 years ago(May 01, 2016 12:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">TALES OF TERROR is an anthology with 3 segments. MORELLA is scary but, because of its subject, it could (and should) have been deeper. THE BLACK CAT doesnt belong in this movie. Its a comedy that tries to scare only 2 or 3 times. Director Roger Corman said that he wanted to break things up by adding humour. Thats fine, but add comic relief; dont turn the whole thing into a comedy! THE CASE OF M. VALDEMAR is the worst of the 3. I mean, if you make an anthology that starts with supernatural horror and psychological horror, you can't expect the audience to then be scared by a <em>beep</em> hypnosis session. Yes, VALDEMAR<br />
rises from the dead, but he does that<br />
at the end. By then, its too late. At least THE BLACK HAT had 1 or 2 scares before the last part. Also, the way VALDEMAR<br />
comes back and the way he attacks CARMICHAEL<br />
is so similar to what happens in MORELLA that it felt like recycling concepts.<br />
You can read comments of other movies at<br />
<a href="http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.cl/2016/05/comments-round-up-april-2016.html" rel="nofollow ugc">http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.cl/2016/05/comments-round-up-april-2016.html</a><br />
Any thoughts?</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/179837/3-10-here-s-why</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 04:37:37 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/179837.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:27:52 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3&#x2F;10. Here&#x27;s why: on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:27:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ChristianeK</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 06, 2016 01:32 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I found it pretty enjoyable. Sumptuous colours made sets and costumes entertaining eye candy.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1510403</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1510403</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:27:54 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to 3&#x2F;10. Here&#x27;s why: on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:27:53 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>ElectricWarlock</strong> — <em>9 years ago(August 04, 2016 08:40 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">The Black Cat is the only one out of the three that I can say I loved. The other two were okay, but I liked the version of "The Case of M. Valdemar" in Two Evil Eyes a lot more. Overall I'd give this movie a 7/10.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1510402</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1510402</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:27:53 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>