<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Today, not so much.  There were movies that were groundbreakers in their day that still hold up brilliantly (Bonnie and]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Tom Jones</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>felstein</strong> — <em>9 years ago(October 02, 2016 04:35 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Today, not so much.  There were movies that were groundbreakers in their day that still hold up brilliantly (Bonnie and Clyde, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Jaws, Star Wars, etc).  Then there are ones like Tom Jones and The Graduate, which have not aged well at all.  1963 was not exactly a great year for English-language movies (particularly in contrast to the previous year) so I'm sure that Tom Jones was the "Best" picture, relatively speaking.  But I still prefer the gorgeously stodgy Cleopatra.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/180243/today-not-so-much-there-were-movies-that-were-groundbreakers-in-their-day-that-still-hold-up-brilliantly-bonnie-and</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 16 May 2026 22:31:49 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/180243.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:21:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>