<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[One of the Academy&#x27;s Best Choices for Best Motion Picture]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Tom Jones</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Bklyn4ever</strong> — <em>19 years ago(July 10, 2006 08:38 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">This film is a rollicking tribute to the picaresque novela genre in which a scoundrel makes his way up the socio-economic ladder with nothing but his wits (sharpened by hunger) and a lust for life.  The score is in a category by itself, as is much of the acting.  And the hunting scene is no amateurish effort, but a delightful recreation of a day in the countryside centuries ago.  I don't see how people can fault a movie of such originality and spunk, one that really transports you into the past as it breathes life into a literary classic, but then again, I am not a fan of "worst" lists to begin with . . . what a waste of time to write about works of art that you don't like or wish to deflate because you feel they are overrated.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/180324/one-of-the-academy-s-best-choices-for-best-motion-picture</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 15:58:43 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/180324.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:28:15 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One of the Academy&#x27;s Best Choices for Best Motion Picture on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:28:17 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Bklyn4ever</strong> — <em>19 years ago(July 27, 2006 07:49 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Thanks; I agree there is a difference.  I still find Tom Jones to be an excellent film and a choice of which the Academy can be proud.<br />
And I don't think it won over Fellini's 8-1/2.  As an Italian-language film, that would have been competing in the Best Foreign Language category.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1514382</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1514382</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:28:17 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One of the Academy&#x27;s Best Choices for Best Motion Picture on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:28:16 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Colkitto</strong> — <em>19 years ago(July 21, 2006 03:18 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Possibly part of the reason why this constantly appears on "Worst Best Picture" lists is the inability of some people to distinguish between a film which may not have deserved to win Best Picture but is still a good movie (<br />
Tom Jones<br />
,<br />
Braveheart<br />
,<br />
Shakespeare in Love<br />
) and one which is actually crap (<br />
Ordinary People<br />
,<br />
Forrest Gump<br />
).</p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto">"An inglorious peace is better than a dishonourable war" ~ John Adams</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1514381</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1514381</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:28:16 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to One of the Academy&#x27;s Best Choices for Best Motion Picture on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:28:15 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Bklyn4ever</strong> — <em>19 years ago(July 21, 2006 01:10 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I'd rather see more posts looking for recordings of "She's a Lady" and "It's Not Unusual" on this site instead of more "Worst Best Picture" posts.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1514380</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1514380</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 08:28:15 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>