<![CDATA[WHY??!! This is a movie (sic!) that ONLY Ed Wood could embrace!! The story and script made absolutely NO sense (!!!), t]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Flesh Eaters

barryfleckmann — 15 years ago(January 15, 2011 08:09 AM)

WHY??!! This is a movie (sic!) that ONLY Ed Wood could embrace!! The story and script made absolutely NO sense (!!!), the dialogue (and acting) was wooden
and the $105,000 sets were sparse. A beach and a few tents, is all. The special effects (???) were cheesy and probably cost the producers $1.98 to make.
The poster describes this as a movie about "young adults?" Well, Rita Morley, who played the "alcoholic actress," was 37 years old when she made this movie, and she looked at least 50!! By the end of this movie, I was rolling around on the floor laughing my butt off! No, I wasn't laughing WITH this film, I was laughing AT it!!! I stayed with the movie, all right, but ONLY because I was hoping that the two "actresses" would get nekkid. They didn't. I should've stayed in bed!
"You can't HANDLE the truth!" Jack Nicholson, "A Few Good Men."

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/180679/why-this-is-a-movie-sic-that-only-ed-wood-could-embrace-the-story-and-script-made-absolutely-no-sense-tRSS for NodeSat, 16 May 2026 12:51:23 GMTTue, 28 Apr 2026 09:13:12 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to WHY??!! This is a movie (sic!) that ONLY Ed Wood could embrace!! The story and script made absolutely NO sense (!!!), t on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:13:17 GMT]]>HunterSVonnegut — 15 years ago(March 01, 2011 10:12 AM)

Thank you, my cock remains limp, then?
You're not sure? ROFLMFAO Looks like you need yet another prescription, Barry

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1517311https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1517311Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:13:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to WHY??!! This is a movie (sic!) that ONLY Ed Wood could embrace!! The story and script made absolutely NO sense (!!!), t on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:13:17 GMT]]>pdogger — 15 years ago(January 16, 2011 04:47 AM)

Lol yes, alas, it remains limp, I guess <:(

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1517310https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1517310Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:13:17 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to WHY??!! This is a movie (sic!) that ONLY Ed Wood could embrace!! The story and script made absolutely NO sense (!!!), t on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:13:16 GMT]]>barryfleckmann — 15 years ago(January 15, 2011 03:02 PM)

Thank you, my cock remains limp, then?
"You can't HANDLE the truth!" enJack Nicholson, "A Few Good Men."

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1517309https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1517309Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:13:16 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to WHY??!! This is a movie (sic!) that ONLY Ed Wood could embrace!! The story and script made absolutely NO sense (!!!), t on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:13:15 GMT]]>pdogger — 15 years ago(January 15, 2011 11:55 AM)

Hmmm no the broads don't get naked, unless you count a brief flash of some female test subjects during a Nazi flashback related by Bartell during the long beach walk laying out the cables.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1517308https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1517308Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:13:15 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to WHY??!! This is a movie (sic!) that ONLY Ed Wood could embrace!! The story and script made absolutely NO sense (!!!), t on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:13:14 GMT]]>barryfleckmann — 15 years ago(January 15, 2011 11:51 AM)

Only IF the broads get naked. They're SUPPOSED to BE "young adults?" They have a LOT of miles on 'em, and fat asses, to boot. This movie is in a league with "Plan 9 From Outer Space." Bad, just bad!
"You can't HANDLE the truth!" Jack Nicholson, "A Few Good Men."

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1517307https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1517307Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:13:14 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to WHY??!! This is a movie (sic!) that ONLY Ed Wood could embrace!! The story and script made absolutely NO sense (!!!), t on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:13:13 GMT]]>pdogger — 15 years ago(January 15, 2011 09:10 AM)

AMC and TCM have always showed a drastically cut-down version of THE FLESH EATERS. Their version is not only missing some great gruesome gore shots, but also several key scenes that explain the flow of events and character motivation. It's a definitely compromised version you saw. Try renting the DVD some day and see the difference.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1517306https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1517306Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:13:13 GMT