This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

Dat's right, I know more than you ever will.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

305,450 folks think different.
No, its a Masterpiece, it's probably the "Tuco" factor rearing its head. 9 times out of 10 the folks who don't care for GBU don't like Eli Wallach's character. Your loss.

This message has been deleted.

The Good,The Bad,and The Ugly is the worst in the trilogy IMO.Way too over the top,and operatic for it's own good.
The very qualities that make it a Masterpiece.

This message has been deleted.

It is the worst of the trilogy (despite my username), but it's still an all-time classic. It's probably the most purely enjoyable film of the 3. The other two are better movies and overall more rewarding experiences but you have to be in the right mood and they require some patience. This one you can throw in anytime.

The worst of the 3 definetly but still better than a lot of the crap films kicking about these days.

This message has been deleted.

This message has been deleted.

I do think Fistful is not quite as good as the later two, but it's still great. All three are great.

Indeed the 'A Fistfull of Dollars' is the worst, but not bad by a long shot, 'For a Few Dollars More' is my personaly favourite out of the 3,
__
Jesus, that's really super
How'd a
nitwit
like you get so tasteful?

With each movie, the level of comedy goes up with GB&U being downright camp. Really, it's a mismatched buddy film. Fistful was the most brutal, especially with the slaughter scene of the entire Baxter camp. I think the overall story in Few Dollars More is better, but spending more money on GB&U to make it the biggest production of the three does not make it the best film of the three. Few Dollars More has a good balance between the humor and dramatic intensity and money spent. Then I would rank Fistful second. But I will watch either of the first two at any given time and save GB&U for the rare viewing.

But the first of the trilogy, Fistful of Dollars was pathetic.
Hehe, what a childish thing to say.
I just watched this for the first time since probably the early 70s and I really enjoyed it much more than I thought I would.
I watched The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly a few days ago and liked it so much I felt I had to see the rest of the trilogy. I'm not disappointed so far.
Gonna watch all Clints early westernsit's been so many years, it's great to revisit them.
http://fallaciousarguments.notlong.com/

I don't think you can talk about "the worst of the trilogy", since all 3 of them are great. I love The Good, the Bad and the Ugly the best though.

I do agree that the For a Few Dollars More and TGTBTU are better films (masterpieces), but that doesn't mean that Fistfull of Dollars isn't an excellent film itself. Leone eventually reached his peak with Once Upon a Time in the West
They call me MISTER Jinx

What, even with Clint's insane mule speech? That alone automatically makes this a good movie.

I agree that it's the weakest out of the trilogy, but it's still good.
The Expendables-

This message has been deleted.

Well, this film is my preference of the trilogy and the one that I think holds up more on repeated viewing. It is spare and has a depth and ambiguity that the successors lacks. I feel like FAFDM drags out for about 30 minutes unnecessarily and TGTBATU is a bit too operatic for it's own good!