<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Dan Duryea]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Flight of the Phoenix</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>js5905</strong> — <em>13 years ago(September 04, 2012 12:17 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Certainly was a departure for Dan Duryea. Totally against type. Shows how good he really was.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/181142/dan-duryea</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 20:59:54 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/181142.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:09:41 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Dan Duryea on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:09:47 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>toshguy</strong> — <em>10 years ago(January 07, 2016 04:44 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Even though it's been a very long time, I feel I should respond to drystyx:<br />
These were not "big stars". They were well-known and respected character actors at best. George Kennedy had very recently made his debut and was yet to become famous with Cool Hand Luke, so he was basically an unknown. Ian Bannen may have been big in Britain, but he sure wasn't in the US. Dan Dureya was very famous, but past his prime and also a character actor whose only starring roles were in B movies mostly from the late 40's and early 50's. Peter Finch certainly was a big deal at the time, but not a huge Hollywood star. There's no doubt that the frequently typecast Borgnine and Kruger were also character actors. The only real big time Hollywood star in the movie was Stewart and he was certainly past his prime by that point.<br />
What I'm basically saying is that the cast was indeed impressive at the time, but not as star-studded as it may seem in hindsight.<br />
I'm here, Mr. Man, I cannot tell no lie and I'll be right here till the day I die</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521008</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521008</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:09:47 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Dan Duryea on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:09:46 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>movies789</strong> — <em>11 years ago(July 29, 2014 07:42 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Duryea was outstanding as Stewart's amoral, tough-guy adversary in "Winchester '73".  One of the best heavies ever in that one.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521007</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521007</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:09:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Dan Duryea on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:09:45 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>js5905</strong> — <em>11 years ago(June 14, 2014 12:13 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">he was a close friend of james stewart and worked with him several times.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521006</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521006</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:09:45 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Dan Duryea on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:09:44 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>drystyx</strong> — <em>12 years ago(February 16, 2014 01:15 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes, a departure for one of my favorites. One thing about the film that certainly was not lost on the movie viewers of 1965, was that many of these were pretty big stars at the time-George Kennedy, Dan Duryea, Ernest Borgnine, and Ian Bannen, yet all were barely more in cameo roles here. I think it was to bring out audience expectations to see them do something rash or active during the film's first viewing, only to show that they were tired men in a rash. I think that's the reasoning for having such big names in roles that were so quiet.<br />
Now go away or I shall taunt you a second time</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521005</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521005</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:09:44 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Dan Duryea on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:09:43 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>srklondie</strong> — <em>12 years ago(January 12, 2014 03:17 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I've been watching him for well over forty years and I don't think I can recall a performance by Dan Duryea that I've ever been disappointed in.  Watch him as ' Duke Pastrami ' in ' Ball of Fire '.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521004</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521004</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:09:43 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Dan Duryea on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:09:42 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>Adam60z</strong> — <em>13 years ago(September 22, 2012 10:16 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Yes, this was a tour-de-force ensemble and he was an important part of it.<br />
For who would bear the whips and scorns of Hollywood (;-p)</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521003</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521003</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:09:42 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>