<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Helicopters]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — The Flight of the Phoenix</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>Adam60z</strong> — <em>12 years ago(March 18, 2014 09:28 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Dorfmann said, "helicopters don't look very eloquent either, but they fly reasonably well."  Or do they?:<br />
<a href="http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-26634632" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-26634632</a><br />
For who would bear the whips and scorns of Hollywood (;-p)</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/181168/helicopters</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 13:12:41 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/181168.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:12:53 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to Helicopters on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:12:54 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><strong>churchr-1</strong> — <em>11 years ago(June 24, 2014 08:19 PM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">I've heard them described as a loose collection of parts that somehow stays in the sky. I have one ride in a hot air balloon and one ride in a helicopter but have never landed in either.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521211</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1521211</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[fgadmin]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:12:54 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>