<![CDATA[I have this on Widescreen…]]>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sands of the Kalahari

MovieHobbit — 18 years ago(May 04, 2007 07:05 PM)

But it's only about a 7.5+ in quality?Anybody have Sands of Kalahari on a decent full screen? Email me at billnbeth96@yahoo.com

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/181282/i-have-this-on-widescreenRSS for NodeWed, 13 May 2026 16:47:39 GMTTue, 28 Apr 2026 10:26:07 GMT60<![CDATA[Reply to I have this on Widescreen… on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:26:09 GMT]]>LorqVonRay1999 — 6 months ago(September 02, 2025 11:52 PM)

Just watched the blu ray and it is a spectacular looking film.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1522046https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1522046Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:26:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I have this on Widescreen… on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:26:09 GMT]]>MovieHobbit — 18 years ago(May 15, 2007 06:48 PM)

It would be interesting to see your full screen, compared to my widescreen. Are you interested in trading or I can purchase if reasonable. Let me know at billnbeth96@yahoo.com

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1522045https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1522045Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:26:09 GMT<![CDATA[Reply to I have this on Widescreen… on Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:26:08 GMT]]>babatjie — 18 years ago(May 07, 2007 07:48 AM)

I have a fullscreen copy, which I would rate at 8.5. But whoever made it (and sold it to me on eBay as a DVD), clearly taped it with high-quality equipment rrom A&E (the logo appears in the corner from time to time, and the ghost of a last frame of a commercial is visible in a couple of spots). While the image quality is surprisingly good, I fear there were extensive cuts for TV. It is only about 95 minutes, and the "attempted rape" scene referred to in comments does not appear.

]]>https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1522044https://filmglance.com/discuss/post/1522044Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:26:08 GMT