<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Blu ray is bare bones, but a VERY nice transfer.]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto"><em>Archived from the IMDb Discussion Forums — Sands of the Kalahari</em></p>
<hr />
<p dir="auto"><strong>FortySecondStreetFreak</strong> — <em>11 years ago(June 07, 2014 08:09 AM)</em></p>
<p dir="auto">Get the blu. The vibrant, crisp, transfer is well worth it.</p>
]]></description><link>https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/181296/blu-ray-is-bare-bones-but-a-very-nice-transfer</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 08:26:29 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://filmglance.com/discuss/topic/181296.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 10:28:02 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>